Shareholder value - measure for project management value, Project Management

Shareholder value

Project management initiative brings a renewed interest among the shareholders. The major investors show more interest by becoming active in the organisation's performance. Earlier punishing the top executives for failing delivery returns was a rare scenario, however currently it is very common. The shareholder value is often an indicative measure to measure the performance. The shareholder value has no clear definition but was generally taken as the measure of whether the organisation had created or destroyed  the wealth for  their  shareholder.  In the  recent  years  a  more reliable measure has been sought. This includes development of two methods - Market Value Added (MVA) and Economic Value Added (EVA).

As the system of analysis, MVA targets to strip out most of the anomalies developed by the accounting standards to give a correct picture about the shareholder value. The basic calculation is to take the amount of money given to the management which is measured by the adding up the money raised through the shares that have been issued, the borrowings and earnings retained. This gives the measure of how much the outsiders had given to the organisation, since it was found. It then takes the present value of the organisation's shares and the debt to measure how much money the investors could get out of the business. The difference is the MVA which is the measure of how the executives running the organisation have fared with the capital which is under the control since the time of organisation's establishment. If the MVA is positive then it means that the value has been created for the investors. If it has been found negative then it means that the investors' money has been destroyed.

The EVA takes after the tax operating profit for the organisation and also compares it with the cost of capital. The cost of capital is an economic concept which includes more than just the interest paid to the bank and also the dividend to the shareholders. For each organisation, the cost of capital changes quite widely. Some of the industries are more risky than the others and the investors will accept lesser returns from the organisation. For example investors will accept lower returns form a big established food group than a fledgling software company. This is because, the food organisation  can  generate  stable  returns  and  it  is  quite  likely  that  the software company will stumble. The EVA shows the difference between the profit an organisation makes and the cost of the capital. If the cost of the capital is not covered along with a reasonable margin then the logical conclusion is that it might have been better if the investor's money might have been placed else where or if the new management team were brought in to make good use of the capital.

If the organisation is consistently developing the EVA every year then the MVA begins to rise. If the EVA is negative then the MVA will begin to fail. MVA is a good guide to where the organisation has come from but the EVA is better guide to where it will go. Of course the shareholder value will relate to the people who will effectively own the organisation.

The growth in the economic profit is considered as the main driver for creating the shareholder value. Some of the firms regard the free cash flow as the driver and also this is similar to the economic profit. The shareholder value measurement should allow the firm to drill down and also to translate the measurement to individual business units. For example, if the board decides that it wants to increase the economic profit by 20 per cent then they can pass the figure (the percentage) down to individual business and also increase the economic profit in the business or divisions. The economic profit can be easily linked to the incentive and the remuneration plan. Apart from  customers  the  organisations  will  typically  have  other  stakeholders whose attitudes and perceptions are important and will have to be managed. These include, for example, the organised labour, the regulators, and the business partners. The pertinent metrics typically depend on the type of the stakeholder and the ways in which the attitudes of the stakeholders are typically expressed or will impact the interests of the organisations. Often the metrics for the shareholder value will consist of the metrics required to recognise. It characterises the importance of the concerned stakeholder group and the metrics will indicate the anticipated reaction of the groups.

Posted Date: 9/29/2012 12:59:36 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Shareholder value - measure for project management value, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Shareholder value - measure for project management value, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Shareholder value - measure for project management value Discussions

Write discussion on Shareholder value - measure for project management value
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Disadvantages of participative management: There are also disadvantages to participative decision-making.  Implementation of the tough decisions taken by the  management th

can make two project for me?

Case study – Grand Wines You are an employee of Grand Wines Ltd and project leader of a proposed project to equip each of the company’s 20 sales representatives with a wireless dat

Characteristics of Flexible Manufacturing System An FMS is a process technology that can product a moderate variety of products in modest volumes and can do so quickly and wit

Your project sponsor has asked you and your team to refine the existing cost estimate for the project so that there is a solid cost baseline for evaluating project performance. Rec

Define the critical path analysis in risk management. Critical path analysis (CPA) or network analysis: Gantt charts are a poor time management tools while projects are l

Program Manager Roles   The following is the role of the Program manager:   Responsible for meeting customer requirements.  Manage risk.  Deliver the program, the p

A strategy for project implementation Projects involving  small number  of  activities,  resources,  constraints  and inter-relationship can be visualized easily by the human m

Question 1: (a) Critically evaluate joint venture and licensing as global market entry methods. (b) Explain and illustrate how a geocentric approach to global marketing i

Q. Why do projects always seem to cost more than expected? In general this seems to stem from three causes. The first may merely be an overly optimistic cost estimate. Sometime