Pumping lemma constant, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

a) Let n be the pumping lemma constant. Then if L is regular, PL implies that s can be decomposed into xyz, |y| > 0, |xy| ≤n, such that xy i z is in L for all i ≥0.

Since the length of xy ≤n, y consists of all b's Then xy 2 z = anbncn, where the length of of y = j. We know j > 0 so the length of the pumped string contains at as many a's as b's as c's, and is not in L. This is a Contradiction L = {w :| n a (w) = n b (w) = nc(w)}

b)

  • Let n be the pumping lemma constant. Then if L is regular, PL implies that s = anbncm can be decomposed into xyz, |y| > 0, |xy| ≤n, such thatxy i z is in L for all i ≥0.
  • Since the length of xy ≤n, there are three ways to partition s:

1. y consists of all a's

Pumping y will lead to a string with more than n a's -- not in L

2. y consists of all b's

Pumping y will lead to a string with more than m b's, and leave

the number of c's untouched, such that there are no longer 2n more c's than b's -- not in L

3. y consists of a's and b's

Pumping y will lead to a string with b's before a's, -- not in L

  • There is no way to partition anbncm that pumped strings are still in L.

Related Discussions:- Pumping lemma constant

Formal language theory, This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Fo...

This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But

Regular languages, LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolea...

LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolean operations which turned out to be identical to SF, the closure of the ?nite languages under union, concatenation and compl

Find regular grammar : a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b, Find the Regular Grammar for the ...

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression:                    a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

Reducibility among problems, A common approach in solving problems is to tr...

A common approach in solving problems is to transform them to different problems, solve the new ones, and derive the solutions for the original problems from those for the new ones

Give a strictly 2-local automaton, Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give ...

Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give a strictly 2-local automaton that recognizes L 3 . Use the construction of the proof to extend the automaton to one that recognizes L 3 . Gi

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd