Path function of a nfa, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

The path function δ : Q × Σ*→ P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings:

1132_Path Function of a NFA1.png

Again, this just says that to ?nd the set of states reachable by a path labeled w from a state q in an NFA with ε-transitions start by ?nding the set of states reachable from q using only ε-transitions and then, for each symbol σ of w (in order) ?nd the set of states reachable from those by an edge labeled σ and then the set of states reachable from those by any sequence of ε-transitions, etc.

Nothing else in the de?nitions need change. The automaton still accepts w if there is any computation on (q0,w) that terminates in a ?nal state after scanning the entire input. Equivalently, it accepts w if there is a path labeled w from the initial state to a ?nal state, which is to say, if δ(q0,w) includes any member of F. Note that the automaton of the example above will accept ‘ε' since state 2 is in ε-Closure(0) and, therefore in δ(0, ε).


Related Discussions:- Path function of a nfa

Non - sl languages, The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure prop...

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language. While the argument tha

Turing machine, design a turing machine that accepts the language which con...

design a turing machine that accepts the language which consists of even number of zero''s and even number of one''s?

Non Regular, Prove that Language is non regular TRailing count={aa ba aaaa...

Prove that Language is non regular TRailing count={aa ba aaaa abaa baaa bbaa aaaaaa aabaaa abaaaa..... 1) Pumping Lemma 2)Myhill nerode

Abstract model of computation, When we say "solved algorithmically" we are ...

When we say "solved algorithmically" we are not asking about a speci?c programming language, in fact one of the theorems in computability is that essentially all reasonable program

Ogdens lemma, proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand ...

proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .

Automata, automata of atm machine

automata of atm machine

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd