Was the case moved to a state court or did the federal court

Assignment Help Marketing Management

Reference no: EM131272746

An engineer had formerly been involved with manufacturing nuclear reactor parts that were to be put onto U.S. Navy vessels. However, he was fired after superiors heard he had been complaining to coworkers about quality control problems he felt he had observed. Such complaints were determined by his superiors as likely breaking the company's Navy contract.

Subsequently, the engineer was fired. The engineer then brought suit against the company for wrongful discharge in 2005. However, he brought the suit in a federal court. His reasoning for suing the company in a federal court was that the firing violated two federal statutes. Specifically, both statutes banned the submission of untrue claims to the military or federal government.

Generally, these statutes concern fraud in government contracting, although the engineer felt that his firing could be loosely linked to government statutes. A wrongful discharge suit, however, is generally subject to state law. Therefore, the company attempted to move the suit from the federal court to a state court, arguing that the federal court had absolutely no jurisdiction over the case. Was the case moved to a state court, or did the federal court want to hear the case because the firing could be loosely tied to federal statutes?

Eastman v. Marine Mechanical Corp., 438 F.3d 544; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3530 (6th Cir. 2006).

Reference no: EM131272746

Questions Cloud

Writing routine and positive messages : Writing Routine and Positive Messages. Use the modified block letter format for this assignment. Please refer to page 421-423 for an explanation of the block and modified block formats.

Which jobs feature which characteristics most strongly : Which jobs feature which characteristics most strongly? Which characteristics are missing, and what are the potential consequences? How could you enrich these jobs to feature more of the job characteristics?

Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case : Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case even if the copyright holders failed to register a work prior to the case?

What are some priority risk factors in your project : What are some priority risk factors in your project? How do these priorities enable overall project accomplishment? Why is it important to prioritize risks in a project?

Was the case moved to a state court or did the federal court : Was the case moved to a state court, or did the federal court want to hear the case because the firing could be loosely tied to federal statutes?

Develop an action plan for the final presentation : Identify the audience, for example a board of directors or a new management team following an acquisition or a merger, for your final presentation due in Week Five. Provide a rationale for your audience selection.

Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case : Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case even if the copyright holders failed to register a work prior to the case?

Consideration of these measures reveals : Consideration of these measures reveals that it can be difficult to quantify these factors. For your first posting in this Discussion, identify one specific example of a measure of learning an

User Account

All Pages