Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case

Assignment Help Marketing Management

Reference no: EM131272748

In 2009, several freelance writers filed a class action lawsuit against publishers, claiming that the publishers had, without permission, reproduced certain works. In other words, the publishers had committed copyright infringement. With the first court's approval, a settlement was reached between the two parties.

However, the writers subsequently decided that they were unhappy with the settlement and appealed. The second court considered whether the federal court had actually had jurisdiction over the case. The second court ultimately determined that federal law (14 USC § 411(a)) takes away federal jurisdiction if a copyright holder has not registered a work prior to suing for copyright infringement.

Thus, the second court reversed the original decision and the settlement did not stand. The case was then brought to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court tried to determine whether the failure of a copyright holder was enough to actually take jurisdiction over the case away from a federal court. How do you think the Supreme Court ruled? Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case even if the copyright holders failed to register a work prior to the case?

Elsevier, Inc., et al., v. Muchnick et al., 130 S. Ct. 1237, 176 L. Ed. 2d 18; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2202 (2010).

Reference no: EM131272748

Questions Cloud

Why the state court in california can or cannot exercise : Prior to his becoming governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger resided as a citizen of California.- Explain why the state court in California can or cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant.

Describe the feelings of tension : Describe the feelings of tension, ambivalence, or frustration that you experience in groups. What role do you typically take in groups?

Writing routine and positive messages : Writing Routine and Positive Messages. Use the modified block letter format for this assignment. Please refer to page 421-423 for an explanation of the block and modified block formats.

Which jobs feature which characteristics most strongly : Which jobs feature which characteristics most strongly? Which characteristics are missing, and what are the potential consequences? How could you enrich these jobs to feature more of the job characteristics?

Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case : Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case even if the copyright holders failed to register a work prior to the case?

What are some priority risk factors in your project : What are some priority risk factors in your project? How do these priorities enable overall project accomplishment? Why is it important to prioritize risks in a project?

Was the case moved to a state court or did the federal court : Was the case moved to a state court, or did the federal court want to hear the case because the firing could be loosely tied to federal statutes?

Develop an action plan for the final presentation : Identify the audience, for example a board of directors or a new management team following an acquisition or a merger, for your final presentation due in Week Five. Provide a rationale for your audience selection.

Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case : Should the federal court have had jurisdiction over the case even if the copyright holders failed to register a work prior to the case?

User Account

All Pages