Identification and issues arising from diagnosis and reflection Theoretical and behavioural skills were clearly identified. Theoretical and behavioural skills were identified but lacking depth. Theoretical and behavioural skills were not clearly identified. Theoretical and behavioural skills were identified. Theoretical and behavioural skills were not identified. Action plan for next 6 months Detailed 6 month action plan with timeline and success measure included. 6 month action plan lacking details with either timeline or some success measure included. 6 month action plan lacking details with either timeline or success measure not included. Less than 6 month action plan included but lacking a timeline and success measure. No detailed 6 month action plan with timeline and success measure included.

2 recent professional interactions identified and analysed based on key areas requiring development which support the need for further personal communication development 2 recent professional interactions were identified and analysed in-depth based of key areas requiring development 2 recent professional interactions were identified but not analysed in-depth based of key areas requiring development 1 recent professional interaction was identified and analysed in- depth based of key areas requiring development 1 recent professional interactions was identified but not analysed in-depth based of key areas requiring development No recent professional interactions were identified Literature Review Both issues were defined, concepts and key models were clearly identified. Both issues were defined, concepts and key models were identified. Both issues were defined, however, concepts and key models were hard to identify. One issue was defined, concepts and key models were identified. No issues were defined, concepts and key models were not identified Identification and issues arising from diagnosis and reflection

Diagnosis and Reflection. All results discussed were relevant to the student and in-depth analysis occurred at a very high standard. All results discussed were relevant to the student and analysis occurred at a high standard. Most results discussed were relevant to the student and some in-depth analysis occurred at satisfactory standard. Some results discussed were relevant to the student but in-depth analysis was missing. The five signed diagnostic questionnaires were not attached to the essay. Discussion of results of relevant diagnostic tools showing an understanding of the results and being able to apply each to their personal situation

Key Criteria Exceeds Expectations Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Meets Expectations Meets Expectations Below Expectations (High Distinction) 85- 100% (Credit) 65 – 74% (Pass) 50 – 64% (Fail) below 50% Introduction (attention-getting statement, thesis, main points to be covered, diagnostic tools to be used and applied, transition to the body of the presentation) Superior articulation of the six elements of an introduction. Above average articulation of the five elements of an introduction. Clearly articulated less than four of the elements of an introduction. Poor articulation of less than three of the elements of an introduction. Introduction contained less than two of the elements of an introduction.

undertaking specific short courses, to develop skills (must be actual courses), undertaking advanced post graduate communication courses at CQU or other institutions, a reading plan to acquire conceptual knowledge, that may include specific communication texts and self-help books (must be specified), maintaining of personal journals reflecting on communication interactions, Identification of a mentor (evidence must be provided). This section must include actionable items with timelines (such as a Gantt chart) and an indication of how you will measure their successful completion.

please give more effort in this essay because its 40 marks essay and take sample essay as a hint which i attached in file and check all three files This assessment accounts for 40% of your final grade. The assessment is due in Week 12 on Friday 6th 5.00 pm. The essay must be 2500 words in length. Two points will be deducted for those essays that are over or under by 200 words. The essay must include a minimum of 12 academic references, one of which may by the assigned textbook for this course. Students should note this is the minimum standard for demonstration of research. Students who only meet the minimum will only receive the minimum grade for this component. There is a late deduction of 2 points per day after the due date. The essay must include a cover page that contains your name, student number, resident campus, assessment title, and lecturer. The essay must conform to the APA style guide. This is a summative assessment so marks will not be released until after Certification of Grades.