There should be no plagiarism Hi sorry i need it on Sunday before midnight and i m in Australia. So you have only 23 hours. FINAL MN621 Assignment-2-T3 Mel Syd V1.pdf The experts are very helpful, thanks to the expertsmind, I could not access the material what were required to do this assignment but the expert helpmed without it and I was not sure whether i am going to get good marks but I got A grade. really experienced.

Demonstration Logic is clear Consistent Mostly Adequate Argument is (10) and easy to logic and consistent cohesion and confused and follow with convincing logic conviction disjointed strong convincing arguments IEEE Reference Clear styles Clear Generally Sometimes Lacks style with excellent referencing good clear consistency (5) source of style referencing referencing with many references style style errors

Evaluation i.e., Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Did not validation and excellent excellent an average an average demonstrate verification of the questionnaire (5) ability to think critically and sourced reference ability to think critically but did not source material ability to think critically and sourced reference ability to think critically but did not sourced the ability to think critically and did not material appropriately material reference sourced appropriately appropriately material reference appropriately material appropriately Network All elements Components Components Most Lacks design and its applications (10) are present and very well integrated present with good cohesion presented and mostly well integrated components present and an average components and not integrated integration well

Grades HD 80% and above D 70 - 79% CR 60 - 69% P 50 - 59% Fail <50% Questionnaire prepared (10) Concise and specific to the project Topics relevant and soundly analysed Generally relevant and analysed Some relevance and briefly presented Not relevant to the assignment topic Questionnaire purpose (10) Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source material appropriately Demonstrated an average ability to think critically and sourced reference Demonstrated an average ability to think critically but did not sourced reference Did not demonstrate the ability to think critically and did not sourced

Network design with proper explanation and justification A clear network design (use netsim only) and proper labelling 10 Demonstration Demonstration of the part of the network in hardware platform in lab • Work progression record and consultation will be on week 9 and 10 by the lab tutor. • Demonstration of a part of the design in Week 11 lab (hardware platform) Demonstration marks will be awarded in regards to the stage of the completion of the demo and viva. 10 References Follow IEEE style referencing 5 Total 50

Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Questionnaire prepared Are question prepared for: • Users • Management • IT staffs 10 Purpose of each question Are questions valid for gathering the information from stakeholders? 10 Validation and Verification plan Is there a plan to verify the gathered requirements from various stakeholders? 5

Word limit 1000 – 1500 Due Date submit individual report on Moodle, demonstration of part of a design in hardware lab Week 11. Submission Guidelines • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a title Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.