turing machine, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:
prove following function is turing computable?
f(m)={m-2,if m>2,
{1,if<=2

Related Discussions:- turing machine

Strictly local languages, While the SL 2 languages include some surprising...

While the SL 2 languages include some surprisingly complex languages, the strictly 2-local automata are, nevertheless, quite limited. In a strong sense, they are almost memoryless

Myhill-nerode, Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff...

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn

Deterministic finite state automaton, De?nition Deterministic Finite State ...

De?nition Deterministic Finite State Automaton: For any state set Q and alphabet Σ, both ?nite, a ?nite state automaton (FSA) over Q and Σ is a ?ve-tuple (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F), w

Notes, write short notes on decidable and solvable problem

write short notes on decidable and solvable problem

Designing finite automata, a finite automata accepting strings over {a,b} e...

a finite automata accepting strings over {a,b} ending in abbbba

Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Claim Under the assum...

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about

Non-regular languages, Suppose A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a DFA and that Q = ...

Suppose A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a DFA and that Q = {q 0 , q 1 , . . . , q n-1 } includes n states. Thinking of the automaton in terms of its transition graph, a string x is recogn

Myhill graphs, Another way of representing a strictly 2-local automaton is ...

Another way of representing a strictly 2-local automaton is with a Myhill graph. These are directed graphs in which the vertices are labeled with symbols from the input alphabet of

Complement - operations on languages, The fact that SL 2 is closed under i...

The fact that SL 2 is closed under intersection but not under union implies that it is not closed under complement since, by DeMorgan's Theorem L 1 ∩ L 2 = We know that

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd