Emptiness problem, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

The Emptiness Problem is the problem of deciding if a given regular language is empty (= ∅).

Theorem 4 (Emptiness) The Emptiness Problem for Regular Languages is decidable.

Proof: We'll sketch three different algorithms for deciding the Emptiness Problem, given some DFA A = (Q,Σ, T, q0, F).

(Emptiness 1) A string w is in L(A) iff it labels a path through the transition graph of A from q0 to an accepting state. Thus, the language will be non-empty iff there is some such path. So the question of Emptiness reduces to the question of connectivity: the language recognized by A is empty iff there is no accepting state in the connected component of its transition graph that is rooted at q0. The problem of determining connected components of directed graphs is algorithmically solvable,by Depth-First Search, for instance (and solvable in time linear in the number of nodes). So, given A, we just do a depth-?rst search of the transition graph rooted at the start state keeping track of whether we encounter any accepting state. We return "True" iff we ?nd none.


Related Discussions:- Emptiness problem

Path function of a nfa, The path function δ : Q × Σ*→ P(Q) is the extension...

The path function δ : Q × Σ*→ P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings: Again, this just says that to ?nd the set of states reachable by a path labeled w from a state q in an

Myhill graphs, Another way of representing a strictly 2-local automaton is ...

Another way of representing a strictly 2-local automaton is with a Myhill graph. These are directed graphs in which the vertices are labeled with symbols from the input alphabet of

Emptiness problem, The Emptiness Problem is the problem of deciding if a gi...

The Emptiness Problem is the problem of deciding if a given regular language is empty (= ∅). Theorem 4 (Emptiness) The Emptiness Problem for Regular Languages is decidable. P

Construct a recognizer, Let L1 and L2 be CGF. We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG t...

Let L1 and L2 be CGF. We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG too. Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the sec

Kleene Closure, 1. Does above all''s properties can be used to prove a lang...

1. Does above all''s properties can be used to prove a language regular? 2..which of the properties can be used to prove a language regular and which of these not? 3..Identify one

#turing machine, #can you solve a problem of palindrome using turing machin...

#can you solve a problem of palindrome using turing machine with explanation and diagrams?

Assignment, Consider a water bottle vending machine as a finite–state autom...

Consider a water bottle vending machine as a finite–state automaton. This machine is designed to accept coins of Rs. 2 and 5 only. It dispenses a single water bottle as soon as the

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd