Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Theory of Noncomputability, Define Noncomputability
When we want to specify the elements of a set that contains only a few elements, the most direct and obvious way is to exhaustively list all the elements in the set. However, when a set contains a large number of an infinite number of elements, exhaustively listing all elements in the set becomes impractical or impossible. For example, we may haveP = {x|x is a high school student in Illinios}Where P is a finite set with a large number of elements. We may have,Q = {x|x is a perfect square}Where Q is a countably infinite set of integers. Also, we may have,R = {x| {a, b} ⊆ x}Note that R is a set of sets such that every element in R has the set {a, b} as a subset.We want to show that there is a possible pitfall when we specify the elements of a set by specifying the properties that uniquely characterize these elements.Consider the setS = {x|x ∉ x}It seems that we have followed the "recipe" and have defined a set S such that a set x is an element of S ifx ∉ x. Thus for example, {a, b} is an element of S because {a, b} ∉ {a, b}. {{a}} is also an element of S because {{a}} ∉ {{a}}. However, suppose someone wants to know whether S is an element of S. In other words, she wants to know whether S ? S. Following the specification, we say that for S to be an element of S it must be the case that S ∉ S, which is a self contradictory statement. Let us turn around and assume that S is not an element of S; that is S ∉ S. Then, according to the specification, S should be an element of S. That is, if S ∉ S then S ? S- again, a self-contradictory statement. We hasten to point out that what we have said is not just a pun and have by no means attempted to confuse the reader with entangled and complicated syntax. Rather, contrary to our intuition, it is not always the case that we can precisely specify the elements of a set by specifying the properties of the elements in the set. Such an observation was first made by B. Russell in 1911, and is referred to as Russell's appendix.
(a) Differentiate the substitution effect and income effect of a price change and illustrate same by way of a diagram for the case of a normal good. (b) Describe with example t
Question 1: (a) Highlight what Business Continuity typically addresses in a business organization. (b) Explain how companies can use internal or external resources for disas
various approaches of test marketing
number of channel levels of panasonic
the relationship between the 4Ps
If a consumer buy an items through a catalog over the phone with a credit card, is the credit card company a channel member? if the product is delivered by FedEx, is the FedEx a ch
Question 1: "Relationship Marketing is a new marketing paradigm which challenges the straight-jacket marketing mix approach." Evaluate this statement and illustrate with examp
Q. Explain Remedy Under Consumer Protection Act? Remedy Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986: A consumer record consumer association central government or state government can
place\distribution
Marketing as an Exchange In contrast to this, relational exchanges (Dwyer et al., 1987) have a longer-term orientation and develop between parties who wish to build long-term
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd