Closure properties of recognizable languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

We got the class LT by taking the class SL and closing it under Boolean operations. We have observed that LT ⊆ Recog, so certainly any Boolean combination of LT languages will also be recognizable. But what about the class of recognizable languages as a whole? Are Boolean combinations of recognizable (not just LT) languages also recognizable. In answering we can use the same methodology we use to show that any language is recognizable: consider what we need to keep track of in scanning a string in order to determine if it belongs to the language or not and then use that information to build our state set.

Suppose, then, that L = L1 ∩ L2, where L1 and L2 are both recognizable. A string w will be in L iff it is in both L1 and L2. Since they are recognizable there exist DFAs A1 and A2 for which L1 = L(A1) and L2 = L(A2). We can tell if the string is in L1 or L2 simply by keeping track of the state of the corresponding automaton. We can tell if it is in both by keeping track of both states simultaneously.


Related Discussions:- Closure properties of recognizable languages

Non - sl languages, Application of the general suffix substitution closure ...

Application of the general suffix substitution closure theorem is slightly more complicated than application of the specific k-local versions. In the specific versions, all we had

Strictly local languages, While the SL 2 languages include some surprising...

While the SL 2 languages include some surprisingly complex languages, the strictly 2-local automata are, nevertheless, quite limited. In a strong sense, they are almost memoryless

Concatenation, We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If...

We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If we think in terms of the LT graphs, recognizing the concatenation of LT languages would seem to require knowing, while

Discrete math, Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expressio...

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

Formal language theory, This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Fo...

This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But

Kleene Closure, 1. Does above all''s properties can be used to prove a lang...

1. Does above all''s properties can be used to prove a language regular? 2..which of the properties can be used to prove a language regular and which of these not? 3..Identify one

Gastric juice, what are composition and its function of gastric juice

what are composition and its function of gastric juice

Strictly local languages, We have now de?ned classes of k-local languages f...

We have now de?ned classes of k-local languages for all k ≥ 2. Together, these classes form the Strictly Local Languages in general. De?nition (Strictly Local Languages) A langu

Decision Theroy, spam messages h= 98%, m= 90%, l= 80% non spam h=12%, m = 8...

spam messages h= 98%, m= 90%, l= 80% non spam h=12%, m = 8%, l= 5% The organization estimates that 75% of all messages it receives are spam messages. If the cost of not blocking a

Finiteness problem for regular languages, The fact that the Recognition Pro...

The fact that the Recognition Problem is decidable gives us another algorithm for deciding Emptiness. The pumping lemma tells us that if every string x ∈ L(A) which has length grea

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd