Were turners actions outside the scope of his employment

Assignment Help Management Theories

Reference no: EM131379147

While Elliot was an inmate at the state-run Chillicothe Correctional Institution, he was hit in the face by Turner, a corrections officer at the institution and therefore a state employee. Elliot brought a lawsuit against the state under the doctrine of respondeat superior .

The state argued that because Turner had acted recklessly in striking Elliot, his actions were outside the scope of his employment.

Therefore, the state concluded, the court should dismiss Elliot's claim against it. Were Turner's actions outside the scope of his employment as a prison guard? Explain.

Elliot v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, 637 N.E.2d 106 (OH).

Reference no: EM131379147

Questions Cloud

Firms in monopolistic competition can acquire market power : Firms in monopolistic competition can acquire some market power by: Which school of thought calls for more information from government policymakers so that consumers can make more rational economic decisions?

Perform the common sizing technique : Perform the common sizing technique (convert the dollars to percentages). Perform a trend analysis for years 1-3. This information will be used to provide a response to the Discussion Board.

Make a scatterplot and describe the association : Why would you not want to talk about the correlation between a planet's Position and Distance from the sun?

How would the court rule : Savant could not be located, so Pierce brought suit against Chapman and Super. Chapman argued that the newspaper notice was sufficient to warn Pierce not to deal with Savant. How would the court rule? Explain.

Were turners actions outside the scope of his employment : The state concluded, the court should dismiss Elliot's claim against it. Were Turner's actions outside the scope of his employment as a prison guard? Explain.

Find the correlation of flights with year : Note two reasons that the correlation you found in part a is not a suitable summary of the strength of the association. Can you account for these violations of the conditions?

The decision was for whom and why : There was no evidence, however, that Carfiro was hired, paid, instructed by, or even known by Chicken Delight. The decision was for whom, and why?

Describe the value proposition : Describe the value proposition behind General Electrics Industrial Internet initiative (e.g. what job does GE’s strategic initiative aim to fulfill for its consumers?).

Excess capacity is problem in monopolistic competition : Excess capacity is a problem in monopolistic competition because if there were fewer firms in the industry: The model of monopolistic competition characterizes a city's market for plumbing services. Suppose that the market is initially in long-run eq..

User Account

All Pages