TOOLKIT – PRESENTATION 5%* Written communication skills are not well demonstrated. Solid demonstration of written communication skills. Which is appropriate for some audiences (expert/non- specialist). Good demonstration of written communication skills. Appropriately written for specialist and non-specialist audiences. Very good demonstration of written communication skills. Written in a compelling manner for specialist and non- specialist audiences. Excellent demonstration of written communication skills. Written in a compelling, authoritative manner

Exceeds standard Distinction (D) 70 -79 High Distinction (HD) 80 -100 and highly cited sources. Shows very good breadth and depth of understanding of innovation models. Very good breath means that you have identified the key models and have done a solid job in explaining them and/or your selection is aligned with the industry sector and/or your description of the three models shows that you have a solid understanding of them. Shows excellent breadth and depth of understanding of innovation models. Excellent breadth means that you have identified key models, categorized them and shown through your explanations that you have an in-depth understanding of them and/or you have a clear and convincing argument for why you have selected the three models you have and/or your description of the models shows real insight into innovation management.

CRITERIA Yet to achieve minimum standard Meets standard Fail (N) 0 - 49 Pass (P) 50 - 59 Credit (C) 60 - 69 Shows a superficial or no understanding of the innovation models Shows some understanding of the innovation models. Some understanding means that you have highlighted some of the key models but not all and/or your selection is not well aligned with the industry sector and/or your description of the three models is too superficial. Shows sufficient breadth and depth of understanding of innovation models Sufficient breadth means that you have identified most of the key models but may not be that clear on all of them and/or your selection is vaguely aligned with the industry sector and/or you description of the three models could have more detail.

Critically analyses, reflects on, organises, synthesises and communicates complex information about innovation management from a broad range of high quality digital sources. A broad range of high quality digital sources means up to 20 solid academic sources including seminal papers, recent articles

TOOLKIT – ANALYSIS 10% Inconsistently demonstrates the ability to critically analyse, reflect on, organise, synthesise and communicate complex information about innovation management. Critically analyses, reflects on, organises, synthesises and communicates complex information about innovation management from a limited range of sources. A limited range of source implies only a few sources referenced (less than 5) and some non-academic sources used. Critically analyses, reflects on, organises, synthesises and communicates complex information about innovation management from a range of academic sources. A range of academic sources means up to 10 sources and most of them are academic sources. Critically analyses, reflects on, organises, synthesises and communicates complex information about innovation management from a broad range of academic sources. A broad range of academic sources means up to 15 solid academic sources.

High Distinction (HD) 80 -100 accountability in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop innovation management capabilities. Exceedingly high level of creativity and initiative means that you have produced an exceptional plan which shows real insight into the area of innovation management.

CRITERIA Yet to achieve minimum standard Meets standard Exceeds standard Fail (N) 0 - 49 Pass (P) 50 - 59 Credit (C) 60 - 69 Distinction (D) 70 -79 innovation management capabilities. Acceptable creativity and initiative means that you have a solid plan, however it could be improved upon significantly. management capabilities. Good creativity and initiative means that you have a good plan, which would benefit from some changes. continue to maintain and/or develop innovation management capabilities. High level of creativity and initiative means that you have a very good plan which just requires some small tweaks.

PERSONAL INNOVATION CAPABILITY AUDIT – PLAN 5% Does not apply knowledge and skills with expert judgment, a high level of responsibility, accountability and professionalism in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop innovation management capabilities. Demonstrates acceptable creativity and initiative and applies knowledge and skills with expert judgement, adaptability, and a high level of responsibility, accountability and professionalism in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop Demonstrates good creativity and initiative and applies knowledge and skills with expert judgement, adaptability, and a high level of responsibility, accountability and professionalism in planning how to continue to maintain and/or develop innovation Mostly demonstrates a high level of creativity and initiative and applies knowledge and skills as well as generating novel information with a high level of authority, responsibility, expert judgement, professionalism and accountability in planning how to

Clarified meanings/changed perspectives implies that based on reflection you are able to summarise your innovation capabilities Fully clarified meanings/changed perspectives implies that based on reflection you are able to analyse your innovation capabilities Expanded knowledge implies that you have summarised, reflected and analysed and are able to show that based on this you have greater insight into your innovation capabilities. Quality feedback from additional sources implies that you have gone to significant effort in gathering data from other sources in order to learn more about your innovation capabilities.

Yet to achieve minimum standard Meets standard Exceeds standard Fail (N) 0 - 49 Pass (P) 50 - 59 Credit (C) 60 - 69 Distinction (D) 70 -79 High Distinction (HD) 80 -100 10% comprehension of innovation concepts to own capabilities. meanings and/or changed perspectives about own innovative capabilities. clarified meanings and/or changed perspectives about own innovative capabilities. meanings and significantly advanced perspectives about educational and life experiences, which provide foundation for expanded knowledge about own innovative capabilities. with quality feedback from additional sources to reveal fully clarified meanings and significantly advanced perspectives about educational and life experiences, which provide foundation for expanded knowledge about own innovative capabilities.

PERSONAL INNOVATION CAPABILITY AUDIT – REFLECTION Makes vague, little or no references to previous learning; has difficulty independently applying knowledge and skills to demonstrate Independently critically reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the classroom) in depth, revealing clarified Independently critically reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the classroom) in depth, revealing fully Independently critically reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the classroom) in depth to reveal clarified Independently critically reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the classroom) in depth and supplements this

Exceeds standard Distinction (D) 70 -79 High Distinction (HD) 80 -100 The reflection shows that the interview provided very good insight into innovation management. Very good implies that the knowledge gained extends beyond the content covered in the course. The reflection shows that the interview provided in-depth insight into innovation management. In-depth implies that the knowledge gained was detailed, extended well beyond the content covered in the course and the student has shown a strong understanding of the concepts of innovation in reflecting on the interview.

CRITERIA Yet to achieve minimum standard Meets standard Fail (N) 0 - 49 Pass (P) 50 - 59 Credit (C) 60 - 69 INTERVIEW 10% The reflection shows that the interview did not provide insight into innovation management. Or the individual selected was not clearly innovative or entrepreneurial. The reflection shows that the interview provided solid insight into innovation management. Solid implies that the knowledge gained was very high-level. The reflection shows that the interview provided good insight into innovation management. Good implies that the knowledge gained was consistent with the content covered in the course.