Other items 13% No lessons learned identified. No team operating rules presented. No sign-off identified. Some presence of lessons learned and/or team operating rules, and/or sign-off. Lessons learned, operating rules and sign-off present at a basic level. Appropriate presentation of lessons learned, operating rules and sign-off. Sophisticated presentation of lessons learned, operating rules and sign-off with significant insight and connection to theory. References 5% References absent or clearly sham Some references present, but are not relevant (possible sham referencing) Some references present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings, but may contain significant errors References present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings, but may contain errors References accurate, present and relevant, and focus upon the Textbook, the PMBoK, and/or the MyReadings.

Criteria Weight Scale 1 Scale 2 Scale 3 Scale 4 Scale 5 evidence of critical thinking. manner. connection to theory. Stakeholders 13% Stakeholders not identified. Stakeholder identification attempted but inadequate. Stakeholder identification shows a basic understanding of the concept and process. Appropriate list of stakeholders identified in a relatively competent manner. Sophisticated identification of risks showing depth of insight and connection to theory. Resources 13% Resources not identified. Resource identification attempted but inadequate. Resource identification shows a basic understanding of the concept and process. Resources identified satisfactorily. Sophisticated analysis and discussion of resources required demonstrating depth of insight and connection to theory.

Risks 13% Risks are not identified and/or lack of assignment and mitigation. Risks identification attempted with some assignment and mitigation at a basic level that lacks Risks identified at a basic level with assignment and mitigation at a basic level Risks are identified, assigned and mitigation measures described in a relatively competent Sophisticated identification and development of milestones showing depth of insight and

Business Case 10% Business Case missing or inadequate. Business Case attempted but lacks insight and critical thinking. Business Case present, demonstrates insight and critical thinking at a basic level. Business case is compelling and demonstrates competent insight and critical thinking. Sophisticated development of the Business Case showing significant links to theory and understanding of the concept. Milestones 13% Milestones are missing or inadequate. Milestones attempted but not appropriate and/or not achievable. Milestones are present at a basic level. Milestones are present and achievable. Sophisticated identification and development of milestones showing depth of insight and connection to theory.

MNG00785 Assignment 1 Rubric Criteria Weight Scale 1 Scale 2 Scale 3 Scale 4 Scale 5 Letter to sponsor 5% Letter to sponsor missing or inadequate Letter to sponsor attempted but lacks clarity, precision or is not concise Letter to sponsor present and demonstrates some insight Letter to sponsor is clear, business-like and concise Letter to sponsor show sophistication, a high level of business acumen and is concise Project Scope 15% Scope statement missing or inadequate. Scope statement attempted but lacks clarity, precision or is not concise Scope statement present and demonstrates some insight. Scope statement is present and is clear and concise Sophisticated development of scope statement demonstrating insight and is precise and accurate.

In the assessment file, find the assignment no 1. Everything is clearly mentioned and even the format is mentioned. I am also attaching a charter template for your use and marking rubric. Format for Assignment 1 The format of the formal assignment will be: • Cover Sheet - with student name and number, title of project, date submitted, word count • Letter to Sponsor • Table of contents • Introduction (use an Appendix for background if necessary - see below) • Project Charter using appropriate headings (see Marking Criteria) • Reference list (Harvard referencing style is required). Please note that because there is such an emphasis on the textbook, all in-text references MUST include the page numbers. • Appendix will only include a background of the organisation for your unit assessor. All forms, charts, tables and diagrams should be included under the relevant sections of the assignment. The Appendix is NOT graded.