Please try to focus on rubrics that given in official document request. Please read carefully all documents. Last time I got good marks because one of your experts follow all the rubrics. Thank you. Thank you for being able to finish my assignment before the deadline. The expert was beyond amazing. I am highly satisfied by your service and planning to give you two more assignments within next two days.

Word count is within + / - 10% of requirement Word count is within + / - more than 15% of requirement Word count is within + / - 15% of requirement Word count is within + / - 10% of requirement Word count is within + / - 5% of requirement Word count is within + / - 0% of requirement /1

Format of answer consistent No efforts made to follow Meets most editing, spacing, Meets editing, spacing, fonts, Meets almost all editing, Meets all editing, spacing, fonts, /1 with question requirements and submission and editing, fonts, and other editing and other editing spacing, fonts, and other and other editing requirements. KBS guidelines spacing, etc requirements. requirements. Some requirements. editing requirements. requirements not met. In-text referencing and Inappropriate referencing. Reasonably appropriate Good referencing, largely in- Very good referencing, 100% Excellent/appropriate /1 reference list follows Harvard Not in-line with requirements referencing, generally in-line line with requirements of in-line with requirements of referencing, 100% in-line with style and consistent with KBS of Harvard style and with requirements of Harvard Harvard style and consistent Harvard style and consistent requirements of Harvard style guidelines consistent with KBS style and consistent with KBS with KBS guidelines. with KBS guidelines. and consistent with KBS guidelines. guidelines. guidelines.

Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation Needs more sentence variety. Little or no thought given to diction. Tone or language is conversational. Contains much informal language. Uses “I” or “you.” Contains many examples of unclear or awkward phrasing. Needs more sentence variety. Attention needed with diction. Contains informal language or conversational tone, or uses “I” or “you.” Unclear or awkward sentence phrasing. Sentence variety is adequate. Tone is appropriate. Diction is clear, but could be more effective. Language is academic, and writing is clear and effective. Very little or no unclear or awkward phrasing. Sentence variety is effective and good. Tone is appropriate and consistent. Diction/ vocabulary is appropriate and effective. Language is academic. Writing is clear, and concise. Sentence variety is effective and sophisticated. Tone is appropriate and consistent. Diction/ vocabulary is sophisticated and effective. Language is academic. Writing is clear, concise, and strong. /1

Appropriate theory and The critique does not have Reasonable critique which Good critique examines the A very good critique Fully considered all the relevant /1 research used to answer appropriate structure and lacks examines the relevant issues relevant issues and makes considered all the relevant issues and made significant question posed direction. No significant and makes reasonable good observations from issues and made important observations made from observations made from observations made from appropriate theory and observations made from appropriate theory and appropriate theory and appropriate theory and research. Good writing and appropriate theory and research. Excellent writing and research. Poor writing and research. Reasonable writing expression of arguments. research. Very good writing expression of arguments. expression of arguments. and expression of arguments. and expression of arguments.

Answer clearly and logically Serious lack of organization. Writing style could be more Paragraphs are generally well presented Body paragraphs do not refer effective. Organization is hard organized. Better transitions back to or relate to main to follow; there is little needed. The progression of arguments. Writing is progression of ideas. Little or ideas could be more formulaic, i.e. “in no transitions between thoughtful. Paragraphs relate conclusion,” “another example is….” paragraphs. Need to more effectively weave main arguments throughout and back to main arguments to prove argument. relate body paragraphs.

Highly accurate tabulation of Schedules/Milestones and Pricing. Schedule of deliverables and milestones for the project outlined. Costs associated with each phase of the project outlined. Precise tabulation of Schedules/Milestones and Pricing. Schedule of deliverables and milestones for the project outlined. Costs associated with each phase of the project outlined. /6

Statement of Work Schedules/Milestones Pricing Inaccurate tabulation of Schedules/Milestones and Pricing. Schedule of deliverables and milestones for the project not outlined. Costs associated with each phase of the project not outlined. Reasonably accurate tabulation of Schedules/Milestones and Pricing. Schedule of deliverables and milestones for the project outlined. Costs associated with each phase of the project outlined. Accurate tabulation of Schedules/Milestones and Pricing. Schedule of deliverables and milestones for the project outlined. Costs associated with each phase of the project outlined.

Broad list prepared identifying and describing specific project tasks within each project phase. Demonstration of high level understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases. Comprehensive list prepared identifying and describing specific project tasks within each project phase. Demonstration of advanced level understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases. /6

Statement of Work Work Requirements Few specific project tasks identified and described. Work requirements not separated into project phases. Understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases not demonstrated. Sufficient list prepared identifying and describing specific project tasks within each project phase. Demonstration of basic level understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases. Ample list prepared identifying and describing specific project tasks within each project phase. Demonstration of solid level understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases.

In depth treatment of Introduction/Background and Project Scope canvassing relevant information from case study including general description of the project and outline of what is and is not included in the project in broader terms Extensive treatment of Introduction/Background and Project Scope canvassing relevant information from case study including general description of the project and outline of what is and is not included in the project in broader terms /6

Statement of Work Introduction/Background Project Scope Introduction/Background and Project Scope fails to canvass relevant information from case study including general description of the project and outline of what is and is not included in the project in broader terms Reasonable treatment of Introduction/Background and Project Scope canvassing relevant information from case study including general description of the project and outline of what is and is not included in the project in broader terms Inclusive treatment of Introduction/Background and Project Scope canvassing relevant information from case study including general description of the project and outline of what is and is not included in the project in broader terms

Hi, I have attached necessary files. Please read carefully all files, then give me reply. Thank you. You will be required to include a minimum of 15 references in your Statement of Work at least 5 of which must come from academic journals or textbooks.