If you need more details please go through below link Please find the webinar recording link for assignment 2 briefing. https://kaplanau.zoom.us/recording/play/QDCSwchfeh9jO9dVoe4JnrlN7k9eyBEReW3G9rM2mije-a-4JMz2wCFXecoa_-0T?autoplay=true&startTime=1536552008000 It’s really useful link for you because each and every detail show in this link please refer this link.https://ev.turnitin.com/student/paper/1005168781/queue_pdf/9F296952-BC98-11E8-B145-F928D3ADC4EF-1005168781?lang=en_us&ready=1 i have attached file please check it. 30179621_1assignment-2.pdf

very much happy with the solution provided. Thanks to team for his support through out my order. As I had urgent submission and they really did well and provided me my solution before deadline, Thanks once again !!!

hello, i have attached 3 files for this assignment. 1st file is guide for assignment and 2nd file is case study file which is important file and make sure need to make as per the guide and case study. and last 3rd file is power-point template for making power-point slides. and moreover i need to write notes for require slides. for example in chart or photos slide need to describe slide in notes within 150 words. not required all slides if slide is complicate to understand that time need to write notes.

Structure Organisation No structure to the assessment. Reader cannot follow sequence. No introduction or conclusion. Apparent that group is not working well together. Group members missing (without valid reason) or not contributing. Ideas not focused. Reader may have difficulty following argument. Main points difficult to identify. No transition between key points. Awkward transition between speakers. Assessment appears to be done by individuals rather than group. Main ideas presented in logical manner. Flow of assessment may be awkward. Group members demonstrate that they have worked on assessment as a whole. All group members take equal share in assessment. Main ideas presented in logical manner. Flow of assessment smooth between speakers. Shows that the group has worked collaboratively Ideas clearly organised so Reader can follow easily. The purpose of the assessment is clear in all stages. Seamless transition between speakers.

Synthesis and conclusion Recommendations Recommendations missing Recommendations very general in nature – client would not be able to implement them without doing further analysis. Recommendations given in a way that they could be implemented but no justification given or benefits explained to the client Recommendations are logical and feasible. Timelines and justifications for these provided. Ties in with the clients brief. Recommendations can easily be implemented. Timelines, responsibilities and costs provided.

Content And understanding Understanding of the project Key points left out. No grasp of issues that faced the client. Over reliance on notes. Includes some issues but analysis glossed over. Team seemed uncomfortable to go beyond key facts. Includes all issues, analysis and recommendations but with little elaboration. Not integrated with theory or are not justified. Builds convincing argument showing how key issues, analysis and recommendations are integrated together. Builds convincing argument showing how all key points are integrated together. Uses examples to elaborate the key points and theory.

Introduction / Conclusion Introduction missing or underdeveloped. Reader has no idea what the assessment will be or was about. No conclusion. Assessment just finishes. Limited clarity of purpose / overview. Highlights key issues but interpretation of these. Conclusion weak. Doesn’t tie in with what was introduced. Provides purpose for assessment, highlights and interprets key issues to be addressed but recommendation but not integrated. As for level below plus shows consistency between marketing problem identification and final recommendations well established. Engaging conclusion clearly sums up assessment and relates back to the introduction.

Research and evidence Evidence of analysis and 3rd party support No references to any sources. Suggestions/recommendations just seem appear. Steps used in analysis shown but little justification why or how these are used to develop recommendations. Background research and analysis of this is clearly identifiable. Steps used are shown and some rationale for the development of recommendations provided. Evidence of extensive research and analysis: journals, prescribed text, other books, verified websites, primary research. Used references to justify analysis As for level below plus able to use references to back up claims and recommendations made. Recommendations clear come from the analysis of the project.