Please read the marking criteria again and again while doing this assignment. Please find the attached case study needed to complete this assignment. Thanks

Research Weighting 10% No authoritative sources, no evidence of research or not relevant for the task. Very limited understanding. The research has not been linked to the main text. Less than 2 authoritative sources or sources are not relevant for the task. Limited understanding. Little evidence of meaningful integration of the research with the main text. Less than 2-3 sources. Some sources lack relevance or authority but are still appropriate for the task. Adequate understanding. The research could be incorporated with the main text more consistently. 3-4 sources. Sources are mostly well-chosen, authoritative and appropriate for the task. Good understanding. The research is integrated with the main text. 4-5 sources. Sources are well- chosen, authoritative and are appropriate for the task. Excellent understanding. The research is very well integrated with the main text. In-text citations and Reference list APA formatted Weighting 5% More than 5 errors. 4-5 errors. 2-3 errors. 1 error. No errors.

Writing Weighting 5% No consideration for presentation. Muddled writing that is very difficult to follow. Numerous grammatical errors. Multiple spelling errors. Acceptable presentation. Long winded and some clear writing presentation. Some grammatical errors. Multiple spelling errors. Tidy presentation. Mostly clear writing but at times long winded. Writing style lacks consideration. Few issues around grammar. Less than 5 spelling errors. Professional presentation. Clear writing mainly to the point. Considered writing style. Excellent grammar with only minor oversights. Less than 3 spelling errors. Polished presentation. Clear and concise writing. Mature and appropriate writing style. Excellent grammar, correct in all aspects. No spelling errors.

ORION Systems B – How will changes impact on problems identified Weighting 10% Well-articulated overview covering how changes will impact on problems identified. ORION Systems B – Who will support plan Weighting 5% Well-articulated discussion about who will support plan and why. ORION Systems B – Who will not support plan Weighting 5% Well-articulated discussion about who will not support plan and why. Conclusion: Present an overview of assignment findings and lessons learned Weighting 10% Exceptionally well- presented and argued; Learnings are comprehensive, well- developed, discussion is clear and there is evidence, facts and relevant examples are presented.

ORION Systems A – Changes proposed Weighting 10% Well-articulated discussion covering a proposed organisational structure and the reasons for these changes ORION Systems A – Revised organogram Weighting 10% Well-articulated organisational structure diagram covering the proposed structure. ORION Systems B – Describe differences between this plan and prior plans Weighting 10% Well-articulated discussion describing the differences between this plan and prior plans.

Criteria Introduction: Introduce case study and provide context around organisational culture Weighting 10% A (80-100) Exceptionally well- presented introduction. High level of detail presented about case study, very well- structured, presented with specific evidence and facts about the case study. ORION Systems A – Project organising recommendations Weighting 10% Well-articulated discussion covering project organising recommendations for the Jaguar project.

Assessed Learning Analyse project organisation in the context of systems thinking and complexity theory. Outcomes: Assess the elements of project organisation and how it is a dynamic 1, 2, 3 process. Examine how to select a project and determine project management strategy. Conditions: This is a compulsory assignment. It must be submitted and makes up 40% of your final result for this paper. The completed assignment is to be submitted to your facilitator via Blackboard by the due date.