This is mini review guideline please read it carefully and use the report in file attached to do the mini review in quality work as guideline requirements and see rubric down and need to make citation and references in APA style use references within 10 years only Limited application of the following areas:  - The overall appraisal of the results of the search (e.g. volume nature and quality of the literature) was stated.   - Reasons for exclusion of potentially relevant studies were clearly indicated.   -Critical appraisal was evident and systematic.  -Main design features, study populations and findings of the studies identified for review were extracted.

Presentation Information is cited properly in an accepted format (APA or Harvard styles). Font, spacing, and wordage are correct. There is 1 or less grammatical error. Information is cited properly. Font and spacing are correct. Wordage out of limit. There are 2 grammatical errors. Information is cited, but has errors. Font, spacing is not consistent. Wordage out of limit. There are 3 grammatical errors. Information is not cited or is cited incorrectly. Font, spacing are incorrect. Wordage out of limit. There are 4 or more grammatical errors.

Discussion - Discussion was succinct and precise conclusions based on the review. -Insights into the problem are appropriate. -Search question were strongly supported in the review. -Student provided concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. Some of the conclusions, however, were not supported in the discussion. -The search question/s was partially answered. -Student provided concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. These conclusions, however, were not supported in the discussion. -The search/s question was partially answered. -Poor discussion. -There is no indication the student tried to synthesize the information or draw a conclusion. No answer to search question/s is provided. Conclusion Detailed conclusions are reached from the evidence offered. Conclusions are reached from the evidence offered. There is some indication of conclusions from the evidence offered. No conclusions are made from the evidence offered.

Findings of the review The following areas were stated and applied: - The overall appraisal of the results of the search (e.g. volume nature and quality of the literature) was stated. - Reasons for exclusion of potentially relevant studies were clearly indicated. -Critical appraisal was evident and systematic. -Main design features, study populations and findings of the studies identified for review were extracted. The following areas satisfactory stated and applied: - The overall appraisal of the results of the search (e.g. volume nature and quality of the literature) was stated. - Reasons for exclusion of potentially relevant studies were clearly indicated. -Critical appraisal was evident and systematic. -Main design features, study populations and findings of the studies identified for review were extracted. The following areas partially stated and applied: - The overall appraisal of the results of the search (e.g. volume nature and quality of the literature) was stated. - Reasons for exclusion of potentially relevant studies were clearly indicated. -Critical appraisal was evident and systematic.

Method The following areas/criteria were stated and applied: - Inclusion and exclusion of studies are stated, applied, and appropriate to the question asked. - The search strategy is described including key words, index terms and any limits or methodological filters used. - Databases searched are identified including known limitations in coverage of the search. -At minimum three databases searched are appropriate to the question asked and criteria set. The following areas/criteria satisfactory stated and applied: - Inclusion and exclusion of studies are stated, applied, and appropriate to the question asked. - The search strategy is described including key words, index terms and any limits or methodological filters used. - Databases searched are identified including known limitations in coverage of the search. -Databases searched are appropriate to the question asked and criteria set. The following areas/criteria partially stated and applied: - Inclusion and exclusion of studies are stated, applied, and appropriate to the question asked.

Rubric of mini-review paper 40% Component Description Score 4 3 2 1 Abstract The main question, methods, and findings and conclusions of the review are given in 200–300 words. The main question, methods, and findings and conclusions of the review are given in below/above 200–300 words. Not all the parts of the abstract are stated and are not in sequence. Weakly organized with no logical sequencing or structure of the abstract. Background of review and search question Research question(s) are formed through the literature review and clearly stated using PICO statement. Research question(s) are formed through the literature review using PICO statement. Research question(s) were not formed but could be formed through the literature review. Research question(s) were not formed and are not apparent from the literature review.

This is mini review guideline please read it carefully and use the report in file number attached to do the quality work as guideline requirements and see rubric down and need to make citation and references in APA style use references within 10 years only