Presentation Information is cited properly in an accepted format (APA or Harvard styles). Font, spacing, and wordage are correct. There is 1 or less grammatical error. Information is cited properly. Font and spacing are correct. Wordage out of limit. There are 2 grammatical errors. Information is cited, but has errors. Font, spacing is not consistent. Wordage out of limit. There are 3 grammatical errors. Information is not cited or is cited incorrectly. Font, spacing are incorrect. Wordage out of limit. There are 4 or more grammatical errors.

Discussion - Discussion was succinct and precise conclusions based on the review. -Insights into the problem are appropriate. -Search question were strongly supported in the review. -Student provided concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. Some of the conclusions, however, were not supported in the discussion. -The search question/s was partially answered. -Student provided concluding remarks that show an analysis and synthesis of ideas occurred. These conclusions, however, were not supported in the discussion. -The search/s question was partially answered. -Poor discussion. -There is no indication the student tried to synthesize the information or draw a conclusion. No answer to search question/s is provided. Conclusion Detailed conclusions are reached from the evidence offered. Conclusions are reached from the evidence offered. There is some indication of conclusions from the evidence offered. No conclusions are made from the evidence offered.

Findings of the review The following areas were stated and applied: - The overall appraisal of the results of the search (e.g. volume nature and quality of the literature) was stated. - Reasons for exclusion of potentially relevant studies were clearly indicated. -Critical appraisal was evident and systematic. -Main design features, study populations and findings of the studies identified for review were extracted. The following areas satisfactory stated and applied: - The overall appraisal of the results of the search (e.g. volume nature and quality of the literature) was stated. - Reasons for exclusion of potentially relevant studies were clearly indicated. -Critical appraisal was evident and systematic. -Main design features, study populations and findings of the studies identified for review were extracted. The following areas partially stated and applied: - The overall appraisal of the results of the search (e.g. volume nature and quality of the literature) was stated. - Reasons for exclusion of potentially relevant studies were clearly indicated.

This is mini review guideline please read it carefully and use the report in file attached to do the mini review in quality work as guideline requirements and see rubric down and need to make citation and references in APA style use references within 10 years only The main question, methods, and findings and conclusions of the review should be given in 200–300 words. Rubric of mini-review paper 40% Component Description Score 4 3 2 1 Abstract The main question, methods, and findings and conclusions of the review are given in 200–300 words. The main question, methods, and findings and conclusions of the review are given in below/above 200–300 words. Not all the parts of the abstract are stated and are not in sequence. Weakly organized with no logical sequencing or structure of the abstract.