Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Question: A speech recognition technology company considered to be "a leader in speech technology products" and valued at $600 million, was in perilous straits. Despite being valued so highly, the company lost money in every year of its existence except for one year. Dragon was sorely in need of capital. Dragon considered merging with another company to sustain itself until it could develop its technologies further and make them profitable. To go about this business, Dragon entered into a contract with Goldman Sachs on December 8, 1999, to "provide [Dragon] with financial advice and assistance in connection with this potential transaction, which may include performing valuation analysis, searching for a purchaser acceptable to [Dragon], coordinating visits of potential purchasers and assisting [Dragon] in negotiating the financial aspects of the transaction."
Goldman formed a four-member team to conduct financial due diligence on Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V. ("L & H"), a company that had offered to buy Dragon for $580 million paid in stock. Goldman's assessment of L & H was "positive in the overall" but "did not give an opinion pro or con on the transaction." In June 2000, the Dragon board approved the merger with L & H and ceased to become an independent entity.
Unfortunately, L & H had improperly recorded $373 million in revenue and was forced to restate its financials for the past two and a half years. In November 2000, L & H filed for bankruptcy, and the share of L & H stock used to pay for the merger became worthless. Goldman's team had not disclosed their concern about the status of due diligence of L & H to Dragon because "the client did not ask."
The assignment in Law deals with the topic "Legal Environment of Business". A case study about Mary, a newly joined employee who is working in the USA and Europe. She faces few issues at her work place in Europe and tries to talk to her manager who s..
This assignment is about the concept of Business Ethics & Legal Issues. The laws relating to these can be found in Antitrust laws. These laws are concerned with those large corporations which have a majority of market share, mergers and acquisitions.
Examples of securities that are exempted from the registration provisions of the 1933 Act and involving misstatement of material facts in a prospectus.
With the aid of a decided cases, discuss the doctrine of ratification of pre-incorporation contract.
It has been estimated that about 6,000 phoenix companies operate in Australia, costing government and the community hundreds of millions of dollars per year and impacting on individuals.
Company Law, Application of Law to Facts and Conclusion.
This assignment related to business law.
Answer all the questions under business law.
Iidentify the issue(s) raised by the facts, identify the relevant legal principles, apply the relevant legal principles to the facts, reach a conclusion.
Prepare a report and present an evaluation of the subsequent methodologies for software development in terms of cost, resources and time.
Business value and ethics, Bart agrees to put Sam's Super Bowl champion-ship autographed football in his sports store to sell for $1,500. Sam agrees to pay Bart a 15% commission for selling the ball. If Joe comes in the sports store and offers Bart ..
Advise what tax consequences arise in respect of the payments.
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd