The assignment was well written and very precisely done. They explained each and every part of the solution. Every answer is well explained and points are highlighted. Thank you for the solution. I am really very much glad to have the services of Expertsmind !!!

Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Discussion of How Benchmarks Are Best Used in the Change Process 30.0% A discussion of how benchmarks are best used in the change process is either missing or not evident to the reader. A discussion of how benchmarks are best used in the change process is present but incomplete or inaccurate. A discussion of how benchmarks are best used in the change process is present but cursory and lacking in depth. Two Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations. 5.0% None of the required elements (two topic-related scholarly research sources and two in-text citations) are present. Not all required elements are present. One or more element is missing and/or an included source(s) is not scholarly research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable.

Course Code Class Code LDR-825 LDR-825-O501 Organic Change 150.0 Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Criteria 100.0% Critique of Several Tactics that Can Be Used to Engage Employees in the Change Process 35.0% A critique of several tactics that can be used to engage employees in the change process is either missing or not evident to the reader. A critique of several tactics that can be used to engage employees in the change process is present but incomplete or inaccurate. A critique of several tactics that can be used to engage employees in the change process is presented but is cursory and lacking in depth.

PLEASE NOTE OLD ROMAN 12, LEFT MARGIN, DOUBLE SPACED, EMPIRICAL ARTICLES 5 YEARS OLD ONLY TO BE USED, HEADER: RUNNING head: ENGAGING EMPLOYEES IN THE CHANGE PROCESS AND HOW TO BENCHMARK THE PROGRESS OF A CHANGE INITIATIVE. PAGE MUST BE NUMBERED IN THE HEADER ON THE RIGHT. THANK YOU.

Change will certainly fail if those most significantly affected by the change are not engaged in the change process. It is also helpful for there to be clear benchmarks that quantify the progress of a change initiative. In this assignment, you will research methods for engaging employees in the process of change and for benchmarking the progress of change initiatives.