Hi team This Assignment is based on the case study provided with assignment file. Can you please make sure the person who will work on it will read and do the assignment accordingly. Thanks

Conclusion: Present an overview of assignment findings and lessons learned Weighting 10% Content is weak and does not offer useful discussion or relevant learnings, discussion is irrelevant. Content is weak and does not offer useful discussion or relevant ideas, no external referencing to support discussion, discussion is irrelevant. Discussion is sound and relevant, learnings have been included but are not particularly well developed or supported, discussion of a generic nature. Well-presented and argued; learnings are detailed and supported by relevant facts and examples. Exceptionally well- presented and argued; Learnings are comprehensive, well- developed, discussion is clear and there is evidence, facts and relevant examples are presented.

Risk management plan: Develop a risk management plan for the case study Weighting 30% No risk management plan developed for the case study which was covered in the literature. Minimal risk management plan developed for the case study which some aspects covered in the literature. Basic risk management plan developed for the case study which is aligned to examples covered in the literature. Useful risk management plan developed for the case study which is aligned to examples covered in the literature. Well-articulated risk management plan developed for the case study which is well aligned to examples covered in the literature.

Risk register: Develop a risk register for the case study No risk register developed for the case study. Minimal risk register developed for the case study. Basic risk register developed for the case study. Useful risk register developed for the case study. Well-articulated risk register developed for the case study. Weighting 10%

Project risks: Risks associated with project Weighting 10% No presentation of risks identified for the project. Minimal presentation of risks identified for the project. Basic presentation of risks identified for the project. Useful presentation of risks identified for the project. Well-articulated presentation of risks identified for the project. Risk Matrix: Undertake risk analysis using risk Matrix tool for the case study No risk analysis undertaken for the case study using risk Matrix tool discussed in the prescribed text. Minimal risk analysis undertaken for the case study using risk Matrix tool discussed in the prescribed text. Basic risk analysis undertaken for the case study using risk Matrix tool discussed in the prescribed text. Useful risk analysis undertaken for the case study using risk Matrix tool discussed in the prescribed text. Well-articulated risk analysis undertaken for the case study using risk Matrix tool discussed in the prescribed text.

Literature review: Undertake literature review covering project risk management Weighting 10% Content is not sufficient to determined understanding, does not offer discussion or ideas, no external referencing to support discussion, discussion is irrelevant. No discussion related to. Content is weak and does not offer useful discussion or relevant ideas, no external referencing to support discussion. Minimal discussion around. Discussion is sound and relevant, ideas are present but not particularly well developed or supported; some evidence of external references, discussion of a generic nature. Basic discussion around. Well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, discussion supported by some external referencing and relevant facts and examples. Useful discussion covering. Excellent well-presented and argued; ideas are comprehensive, well- developed, discussion supported by appropriate external referencing, specific evidence and facts, relevant examples suggested. Well- articulated overview covering.

Criteria E (0-39) D (40-49) C (50-64) B (65-79) A (80-100) Introduction: Introduce case study and provide context around the case Weighting 10% Introduction does not offer only context for the subject to be discussed. Introduction not included about the case study. Introduction is weak and does not offer useful context for the subject to be discussed. Introduction is poorly structured about the case study. Satisfactory introduction with useful content about the subject to be discussed. Content is sound but not particularly well developed, structured or supported about the case study. Good introduction and well-presented and argued. Introduction is detailed, developed and supported with good evidence and detail about the case study. Exceptionally well- presented introduction. High level of detail presented about case study, very well- structured, presented with specific evidence and facts about the case study.

Hi team looking to get this assignment done. please read the marking criteria. the case study is attached with the question so please read through the case study. Analyse areas of risk in the project management lifecycle. Undertake a risk analysis and justify conclusions. Compare and contrast problem-solving methods for dealing with problems when they arise in projects and apply them to a specific scenario providing justification for the chosen approach.