Sketch an algorithm for recognizing language, Theory of Computation

Suppose A = (Σ, T) is an SL2 automaton. Sketch an algorithm for recognizing L(A) by, in essence, implementing the automaton. Your algorithm should work with the particular automaton being given as a table of some sort, so that it can be easily generalized for the next part of the exercise. Your algorithm may halt as soon as it detects that the input is not in the language.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 5:47:37 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Sketch an algorithm for recognizing language, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Sketch an algorithm for recognizing language, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Sketch an algorithm for recognizing language Discussions

Write discussion on Sketch an algorithm for recognizing language
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Applying the pumping lemma is not fundamentally di?erent than applying (general) su?x substitution closure or the non-counting property. The pumping lemma is a little more complica

how to find whether the language is cfl or not?

Theorem The class of ?nite languages is a proper subclass of SL. Note that the class of ?nite languages is closed under union and concatenation but SL is not closed under either. N

While the SL 2 languages include some surprisingly complex languages, the strictly 2-local automata are, nevertheless, quite limited. In a strong sense, they are almost memoryless

draw pda for l={an,bm,an/m,n>=0} n is in superscript

Our primary concern is to obtain a clear characterization of which languages are recognizable by strictly local automata and which aren't. The view of SL2 automata as generators le

The generalization of the interpretation of strictly local automata as generators is similar, in some respects, to the generalization of Myhill graphs. Again, the set of possible s

Let G be a graph with n > 2 vertices with (n2 - 3n + 4)/2 edges. Prove that G is connected.

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn

The Myhill-Nerode Theorem provided us with an algorithm for minimizing DFAs. Moreover, the DFA the algorithm produces is unique up to isomorphism: every minimal DFA that recognizes