Instantaneous description - recognizable language, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

De?nition (Instantaneous Description) (for both DFAs and NFAs)

An instantaneous description of A = (Q,Σ, δ, q0, F), either a DFA or an NFA, is a pair hq,wi ∈ Q×Σ*, where q the current state and w is the portion of the input under and to the right of the read head.

The directly computes relation is also the same.

De?nition (Directly Computes Relation) (for both DFAs and NFAs without ε-transitions).

210_recognizable language.png

 

Note that while this is de?ned identically for both DFAs and NFAs, in the case of NFAs it is no longer even partial functional; an ID may well have many successors. Moreover, it is no longer true that the only IDs without successors are those in which w = ε. The effect of this is that the transition function (δ(q, σ)) as we de?ned it earlier is no longer total or even functional: there may be some q and σ for which δ(q, σ) is not de?ned (in notation: δ(q, σ)↑) and there may be some q and σ for which there are multiple states which could be the value of δ(q, σ). We can accommodate both of these possibilities by taking the transition function for NFAs to be a function returning a set of states.


Related Discussions:- Instantaneous description - recognizable language

#dfa, Give DFA''s accepting the following languages over the alphabet {0,1}...

Give DFA''s accepting the following languages over the alphabet {0,1}: i. The set of all strings beginning with a 1 that, when interpreted as a binary integer, is a multiple of 5.

Push down automata, Construct a PDA that accepts { x#y | x, y in {a, b}* su...

Construct a PDA that accepts { x#y | x, y in {a, b}* such that x ? y and xi = yi for some i, 1 = i = min(|x|, |y|) }. For your PDA to work correctly it will need to be non-determin

Language accepted by a nfa, The language accepted by a NFA A = (Q,Σ, δ, q 0...

The language accepted by a NFA A = (Q,Σ, δ, q 0 , F) is NFAs correspond to a kind of parallelism in the automata. We can think of the same basic model of automaton: an inpu

Concatenation, We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If...

We saw earlier that LT is not closed under concatenation. If we think in terms of the LT graphs, recognizing the concatenation of LT languages would seem to require knowing, while

Notes, write short notes on decidable and solvable problem

write short notes on decidable and solvable problem

Suffix substitution closure, Our primary concern is to obtain a clear chara...

Our primary concern is to obtain a clear characterization of which languages are recognizable by strictly local automata and which aren't. The view of SL2 automata as generators le

Qbasic, Ask question #Minimum 100 words accepte

Ask question #Minimum 100 words accepte

Computations of sl automata, We will specify a computation of one of these ...

We will specify a computation of one of these automata by specifying the pair of the symbols that are in the window and the remainder of the string to the right of the window at ea

Two-tape turing machine, Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG ...

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG . Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the second

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd