Prepare the consolidated financial statements, Theory of Computation

Prepare the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2011.

On 1 July 2006, Mark Ltd acquired all the share capitall of john Ltd for $700,000. At the date , John Ltd's equity consisted of the following:

Share capital                      $500,000

General reserve                  $ 100,000

Retained Earnings              $ 50,000

At 1 July 2007, all the identifiable assets and liabilities of John Ltd were recorded at fair value.

Financial information for Mark Ltd and John Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2011 is presented in the left hand columns of the worksheet. It is assumed that both companies use the perpetual inventory system.

Additional information:

a) During the year 2010-11, John Ltd  paid a dividend of $30,000 from profits earned before 20 June,2007.

b) On January 1 2011, John Ltd sold merchandise costing $40,000 to Mark Ltd for $50,000. Half this merchandise was sold to external entities for $30,000 before 30 June2011.

c) It is estimated that goodwill acquired in John Ltd has been impaired by an amount of $7000.

d) Mark Ltd sells plant to John Ltd for $8,500. This plant initially cost Mark Ltd $15,000, is 5 years old and has an accumulated depreciation of $8000 at the date of sale . The remaining useful life is assessed as 7 years.

e) At July 1 2010, there was a profit in the inventory of Mark Ltd of $4000 on goods acquired from John Ltd in the previous period.

f) The tax rate is 30%.

Posted Date: 3/18/2013 1:15:58 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Prepare the consolidated financial statements, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Prepare the consolidated financial statements, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Prepare the consolidated financial statements Discussions

Write discussion on Prepare the consolidated financial statements
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

The fact that the Recognition Problem is decidable gives us another algorithm for deciding Emptiness. The pumping lemma tells us that if every string x ∈ L(A) which has length grea

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG . Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the second

construct a social network from the real-world data, perform some simple network analyses using Gephi, and interpret the results.

Kleene called this the Synthesis theorem because his (and your) proof gives an effective procedure for synthesizing an automaton that recognizes the language denoted by any given r

This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But

The fundamental idea of strictly local languages is that they are speci?ed solely in terms of the blocks of consecutive symbols that occur in a word. We'll start by considering lan

When we say "solved algorithmically" we are not asking about a speci?c programming language, in fact one of the theorems in computability is that essentially all reasonable program

For every regular language there is a constant n depending only on L such that, for all strings x ∈ L if |x| ≥ n then there are strings u, v and w such that 1. x = uvw, 2. |u