Q. Will the use of fca dispirit communities from allowing the environment while they consider solid waste management options?

No. While FCA only obtain into account the tangible, monetary costs linked with solid waste management, communities can and should consider environmental, social, and health costs within their decision-making. Sitting a fresh landfill, for example, may be the least costly option for managing solid waste, but a community may choose not to do it for ecological reasons and may start a recycling program in its place. FCA encourages communities to see every solid waste management opportunity in the context of the solid waste system as a entire. FCA makes it clear that modification in one program (e.g., recycling) can have consequences on other programs, such like garbage collection, processing, and disposal, plus impacts on overhead costs.