Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Illustrtaion of Rules relating to consideration
Foakes v Beer (1884)
Actually On the date 11th of August, 1875 Mrs Beer wrapped judgment next to Dr. Foakes for £2,077 17s 2d to debt and £13 ls 10d for costs. Well On the date 21st of December 1876 a memorandum of agreement was made and signed through Dr Foakes and Mrs Beer such Dr Foakes paid £500 at once and then the balance in instalments of £150 on the first day of July and January or during one calendar month after each of the said days respectively in every year until the complete of the £2,090 19s Od was paid, thus Mrs Beer would not "take any proceedings anything on the judgment". On the contrary Dr Foakes paid the entire sum of £2090 19s Od as had been agreed whereupon Mrs Beer asked him for pay the interest accrued on such judgement. Then he rejected to do so, relying on the agreement between him and Mrs Beer there. Hence Mrs Beer successfully sued to the interest after contending such the agreement between her and Dr Foakes was unsupported through consideration. Dr Foakes' appeal for the House of Lords was dismissed with costs.
Lord Selborne stated:
"Without a doubt if the appellant had been under no antecedent obligation for pay the whole debt, thus his fulfilment of the condition might have imported some consideration upon his part about that promise. Although he was under that antecedent obligation; whereas and payment at those deferred dates so through the forbearance and indulgence by the creditor, of the residue of the principal debt and costs, could not as like in my opinion be a consideration to relinquishment about interest and discharge of the judgement"
QUESTION 1 (a) Section 45(10) provides for remedies that the Independent Review Panel may recommend if it finds merit in an application for review. State three of those remedie
Convening of General Meetings: General meetings are normally convened by the Board of Directors pursuant, to the relevant provision of the company's articles, such as Table A,
Adequacy of consideration - Law of Contract Well provided that consideration is sufficient, or actual it necessitate not be adequate. Hence the court will not compare the val
Describe in detail about the - policy makers Elections are used to choose the policy makers, it is not the only mechanism. Since the authority to make decisions may be vested i
Effect Of Rescission: Where a contract of allotment is rescinded, the former shareholder will be entitled to his money back (normally with interest) and to a refund of any exp
Q. Diffrence between phoenix activity and honest behaviour? There are circumstances where a business has been managed responsibly and fails, and after a period of time, its di
As organisations affect many people, they have obligations to their employees, consumers, community and the world. They have a responsibility to conduct business in a way that is n
Q. Liability based definition of phoenix activity? The definition used by Treasury, and used as a working definition for this project, focuses on the intent with which phoenix
QUESTION 1 (a) What are the essential elements for a valid contract as stipulated by article 1108 of the Civil Code (CCM)? (b) How can consent be vitiated in relation to con
1. Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court are appointed for life. Unless they choose to retire, they have the right to remain in office and cannot be removed by congress or by the Pres
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd