Case study in game theory - color coordination, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

Game 1 Color Coordination (with Delay)

594_Color coordination.png

This game should be played twice, once without the delay tactic and once with it, to show the difference between out- comes in the simultaneous and sequential versions. As usual, the game can be played by pairs of students, although it can also be played by all students simultaneously with the left- hand side of the room's playing against the right-hand side. Tell the students not to write down anything (except their names) until they hear all of the instructions. As with the tacit coordination game, you might want to provide some inducement for coordination here; chocolate usually works well.

Ask the students to choose partners from the other side of the room or have them imagine that each is playing with one person who is sitting on the other side of the room. Each student will eventually be asked to write either pink or purple. If both students in the real or imaginary pair write pink, the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the left-hand side of the room gets 40 points. ("Right-hand" and "left-hand" are defined from the students' point of view.) If both write purple, the person on the left- hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 40 points. If the answers don't match, neither player gets anything.

To play without the delay tactic, simply ask the students to choose a color and write the choice. Then play again, im- mediately, but explain that you will flip a coin first. If it comes up heads, those on the right-hand side of the room get to write their answers first; otherwise those on the left-hand side of the room write first.

Once you have collected answers from the students, you can discuss the implications of the game. Clearly, it is much more difficult to coordinate without the benefit of the delay tactic and there are two equilibria in pure strategies in the simultaneous-move game. The delay tactic makes the game sequential and creates a first-mover advantage; outcomes from this version often come much closer to complete co- ordination. As usual, you can ask students to try to come up with real-world situations that replicate some of the conditions of the game, or you can provide some examples.


Related Discussions:- Case study in game theory - color coordination

Game, The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the cho...

The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the choices of some players impacts the payoffs of others. A game is described by its players, every player's methods,

Multiple nash equilibria, The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooper...

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is/are the Nash Equil

Pareto optimal, Named when Vilfredo Pareto, Pareto optimality may be alive ...

Named when Vilfredo Pareto, Pareto optimality may be alive of potency. An outcome of a game is Pareto optimal if there's no different outcome that produces each player a minimum of

Games sequential moves-game played b/w pitcher and batter, Problem: Consid...

Problem: Consider a (simplified) game played between a pitcher (who chooses between throwing a fastball or a curve) and a batter (who chooses which pitch to expect). The batter ha

NAsh equilibrium, Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 ...

Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 chooses columns and player 3 chooses matrices. Only Player 3''s payoffs are given below. Show that D is not a best response

Positive add, In a positive add game, the combined payoffs of all players a...

In a positive add game, the combined payoffs of all players aren't identical in each outcome of the sport. This differs from constant add (or zero add) games during which all outco

Cournot and Stackelberg., Consider two identical firms, for each firm, the ...

Consider two identical firms, for each firm, the total cost of producing q units of output is C(q)=0.5q^2. The price is determined as P(q1,q2)- a-q1-q2. Estimate Cournots outcome;

Totally mixed strategy, A mixed strategy during which the player assigns st...

A mixed strategy during which the player assigns strictly positive chance to each pure strategy.Morgenstern, Oskar,Coauthor of Theory of Games and Economic Behavior with John von N

Game playing in class-equilibrium payoffs are (4, Equilibrium payoffs are (...

Equilibrium payoffs are (4, 5). Player A’s equilibrium strategy is “S then S if n and then N if n again.” Player B’s equilibrium strategy is “n if S and then n if S again and then

Formulate the situation as strategic game - nash equilibrium, Two individua...

Two individuals use a common resource (a river or a forest, for example) to produce output. The more the resource is used, the less output any given individual can produce. Denote

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd