Case study in game theory - color coordination, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

Game 1 Color Coordination (with Delay)

594_Color coordination.png

This game should be played twice, once without the delay tactic and once with it, to show the difference between out- comes in the simultaneous and sequential versions. As usual, the game can be played by pairs of students, although it can also be played by all students simultaneously with the left- hand side of the room's playing against the right-hand side. Tell the students not to write down anything (except their names) until they hear all of the instructions. As with the tacit coordination game, you might want to provide some inducement for coordination here; chocolate usually works well.

Ask the students to choose partners from the other side of the room or have them imagine that each is playing with one person who is sitting on the other side of the room. Each student will eventually be asked to write either pink or purple. If both students in the real or imaginary pair write pink, the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the left-hand side of the room gets 40 points. ("Right-hand" and "left-hand" are defined from the students' point of view.) If both write purple, the person on the left- hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 40 points. If the answers don't match, neither player gets anything.

To play without the delay tactic, simply ask the students to choose a color and write the choice. Then play again, im- mediately, but explain that you will flip a coin first. If it comes up heads, those on the right-hand side of the room get to write their answers first; otherwise those on the left-hand side of the room write first.

Once you have collected answers from the students, you can discuss the implications of the game. Clearly, it is much more difficult to coordinate without the benefit of the delay tactic and there are two equilibria in pure strategies in the simultaneous-move game. The delay tactic makes the game sequential and creates a first-mover advantage; outcomes from this version often come much closer to complete co- ordination. As usual, you can ask students to try to come up with real-world situations that replicate some of the conditions of the game, or you can provide some examples.


Related Discussions:- Case study in game theory - color coordination

Zero sum, A zero add game may be a special case of a continuing add game du...

A zero add game may be a special case of a continuing add game during which all outcomes involve a add of all player's payoffs of zero. Hence, a gain for one participant is usually

Perfect nash equilibrium, Perfect Nash equilibrium Two students prepar...

Perfect Nash equilibrium Two students prepare their homework assignment together for a course. They both enjoy getting high grade for their assignment, but they dislike workin

Game, The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the cho...

The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the choices of some players impacts the payoffs of others. A game is described by its players, every player's methods,

Game tree, A game tree (also referred to as the in depth form) may be a gra...

A game tree (also referred to as the in depth form) may be a graphical illustration of a sequential game. It provides data concerning the players, payoffs, strategies, and also the

Tower defense game, Tower defense - is a subgenre of real-time strategy gam...

Tower defense - is a subgenre of real-time strategy games. The goal of tower defense games is to try to stop enemies from crossing a map by building towers which shoot at them as t

Pareto economical , Named when Vilfredo Pareto, Pareto potency (or Pareto o...

Named when Vilfredo Pareto, Pareto potency (or Pareto optimality) may be alive of potency. An outcome of a game is Pareto economical if there's no different outcome that produces e

Dominant strategy equilibrium, The following is a payoff matrix for a non-c...

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is the Dominant Strat

Design mousetrap game board, Three flowcharts and the game board for your m...

Three flowcharts and the game board for your mousetrap game should be submitted. You can use board_design.pdf to help you lay out your board. Basically, you can use any shapes you

Calculate the expected payout, James and Dean are playing the Chicken game....

James and Dean are playing the Chicken game. They have noticed that their payout for being perceived as "tough" depends on the size of the crowd. The larger the crowd, the "cooler"

Strictly dominant strategy , A strategy is strictly dominant if, no matter ...

A strategy is strictly dominant if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a strictly higher payoff than the other. Hence, a method is strictly dominant i

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd