Case study in game theory - color coordination, Game Theory

Assignment Help:

Game 1 Color Coordination (with Delay)

594_Color coordination.png

This game should be played twice, once without the delay tactic and once with it, to show the difference between out- comes in the simultaneous and sequential versions. As usual, the game can be played by pairs of students, although it can also be played by all students simultaneously with the left- hand side of the room's playing against the right-hand side. Tell the students not to write down anything (except their names) until they hear all of the instructions. As with the tacit coordination game, you might want to provide some inducement for coordination here; chocolate usually works well.

Ask the students to choose partners from the other side of the room or have them imagine that each is playing with one person who is sitting on the other side of the room. Each student will eventually be asked to write either pink or purple. If both students in the real or imaginary pair write pink, the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the left-hand side of the room gets 40 points. ("Right-hand" and "left-hand" are defined from the students' point of view.) If both write purple, the person on the left- hand side of the room gets 50 points and the person on the right-hand side of the room gets 40 points. If the answers don't match, neither player gets anything.

To play without the delay tactic, simply ask the students to choose a color and write the choice. Then play again, im- mediately, but explain that you will flip a coin first. If it comes up heads, those on the right-hand side of the room get to write their answers first; otherwise those on the left-hand side of the room write first.

Once you have collected answers from the students, you can discuss the implications of the game. Clearly, it is much more difficult to coordinate without the benefit of the delay tactic and there are two equilibria in pure strategies in the simultaneous-move game. The delay tactic makes the game sequential and creates a first-mover advantage; outcomes from this version often come much closer to complete co- ordination. As usual, you can ask students to try to come up with real-world situations that replicate some of the conditions of the game, or you can provide some examples.


Related Discussions:- Case study in game theory - color coordination

Pure coordination game, Scenario Two corporations should simultaneously ...

Scenario Two corporations should simultaneously elect a technology to use for his or her compatible merchandise. If the corporations adopt totally different standards, few sales

Dominated strategy , A strategy is dominated if, no matter what the other p...

A strategy is dominated if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a smaller payoff than another strategy. Hence, a method is dominated if it's invariably

Vickrey auction, A sealed-bid second worth auction during which participant...

A sealed-bid second worth auction during which participants every simultaneously submit bids. The auctioneer discloses the identity of the very best bidder who is said the winner.

Repeated game, When players interact by enjoying an identical stage game (s...

When players interact by enjoying an identical stage game (such because the prisoner's dilemma) varied times, the sport is termed a repeated game. not like a game played once, a re

Incentive, A payoff offerd as a bequest for someone partaking in some activ...

A payoff offerd as a bequest for someone partaking in some activity that doesn't directly provide her with profit. Often, such incentives are given to beat the ethical hazard drawb

Strategies against hostage takers, Strategies against Hostage Takers T...

Strategies against Hostage Takers T ypical Situations Terrorists: usually have several hostages, demands are polit- ical, may be fanatics, location may be public or sec

Nash equilibrium - pay off, The following is a payoff matrix for a non-coop...

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is the Nash Equilibri

What terms are included in the monopolistic competition, What terms are inc...

What terms are included in the monopolistic competition? Product Differentiation: 1. The meaning of monopolistic competition and product differentiation 2. Why monopolist

Payoff matrix, 1. The publishing industry in the country of Font, where the...

1. The publishing industry in the country of Font, where the local currency is the stet, is dominated by two companies, the Arial Book Co. and Verdana Works Ltd.. Currently, both o

non-credible threat , A non-credible threat may be a threat created by a p...

A non-credible threat may be a threat created by a player in a very Sequential Game which might not be within the best interest for the player to hold out. The hope is that the thr

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd