case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'''' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'''' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'''' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'''' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Group account form - accounts and audit, Group Accounts' form: S.151(...

Group Accounts' form: S.151(1) provides that the group accounts laid before a holding company shall be consolidated accounts comprising- (a)   like with a consolidated bala

Describe the relationship that bank shares with its customer, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 Barclays Bank in Mauritius has interviewed various candidates for the post of Chief Executive Officer. Its HR department has requested you to provide them with some

What are the limitations on economic rights, Question 1: (a) What are t...

Question 1: (a) What are the considerations that apply for a computer contract? (b) How is Industrial Property protected in Mauritius? Question 2: Explain the princi

Disadvantages of statute law, Disadvantages of Statute Law: Impositio...

Disadvantages of Statute Law: Imposition of law However some Acts are imposed on the people and reflect the views of the pundits or Executive in the ruling political part

Oppression of minorities, OPPRESSION OF  MINORITIES:                  ...

OPPRESSION OF  MINORITIES:                    7.3.1 Section 211 of the Act provides that any member of a company who complains that the affairs of the company are being conduc

Advise sandy on the following issues, Problem I. Sandy has been worki...

Problem I. Sandy has been working for Bean Canning Ltd for 9 years. Last Monday Sandy was called to the Manager's Office and verbally informed that her employment was termi

What is a contract, QUESTION (i) Briefly explain the following in relat...

QUESTION (i) Briefly explain the following in relation to the legal structure of Mauritius- Legislative branch Executive branch Judiciary branch Local Government

Advocates, Advocates Whether in sec 3(1) of the Interpretation and Gen...

Advocates Whether in sec 3(1) of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act cap 2 and sec 2 of the Advocates Act (1989) an advocate is a person that whose name has been dul

Types of authority - agency law, Types of Authority - Agency Law Furth...

Types of Authority - Agency Law Further there are three types of authority namely like:; (a) Real or factual However this is the authority that in fact is given to the

Estoppel - law of agency and partnership, Estoppel - Law of Agency and Part...

Estoppel - Law of Agency and Partnership Further the basis of estoppel was explained through the court like Spiro v. Lintern  in giving such; "Where a man is below a duty -

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd