case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'''' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'''' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'''' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'''' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Legislated to combat computer misuse and cybercrimes, QUESTION 1 Domain...

QUESTION 1 Domain names deliver the address of companies on the Internet and are equivalent to the business address in the physical world. As more and more companies utilize th

Explain the human rights of international laws, HUMAN RIGHTS   Human right...

HUMAN RIGHTS   Human rights are something which we frequently hear about, discuss, and have probably read a great deal on as well. Most political and social discussions revolve ar

Need for research design, Need for research Design: a. It facilities ...

Need for research Design: a. It facilities the smooth sailing of the various research operations thereby making research as efficient as possible yielding maximal inf

Define qualified and absolute privilege, 1. What is purpose of section 91 a...

1. What is purpose of section 91 and section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1982? 2. Explain the risk assumed by an unlicensed tradesperson (eg. Electrician or Plumber) when ent

Discuss the ethical issues, An employee at the supermarket you manage moppe...

An employee at the supermarket you manage mopped one of the aisles in the store and placed signs at the ends of the aisle to warn people not to use the aisle until the floor dried.

Example of business law and ethics, Frank, a student at Anne Arundel Commun...

Frank, a student at Anne Arundel Community College, is on his way to class one day. He enjoys his class very much and is looking forward to this particular class on tort law, but d

Loans to directors, Loans to Directors: Section 191(1) renders unlawfu...

Loans to Directors: Section 191(1) renders unlawful any loan made by a company to a director of the company or its holding company. It is also unlawful for the company to guar

Determine the schemes of michael mandelbaum, Determine the schemes of Micha...

Determine the schemes of Michael Mandelbaum Michael Mandelbaum has offered a two fold scheme, the inside-out and outside-in approach. According to inside-out approach, a natio

Scheme of arrangement, Scheme of Arrangement: The following sequence o...

Scheme of Arrangement: The following sequence of action is necessary:  (a) application is made to the court (usually by the company itself) for an order that one or more me

High court registrars, High Court Registrars Therefore these are magis...

High Court Registrars Therefore these are magistrates that who in addition to judicial functions perform administrative responsibility. Thus they are appointed through the Jud

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd