case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'''' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'''' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'''' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'''' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Define the principle of prescription, Define the principle of prescription ...

Define the principle of prescription Prescription   (res  nullius-an  asset susceptible of acquisition but presently under the ownership or sovereignty of no legal person). Pr

Laws and regulations, Here, we have outlined the utility of National Buildi...

Here, we have outlined the utility of National Building Code. We have explained the main features of Factories Act. Some of the provisions of Electricity Act and Rules which are re

Corporation sole - types of corporations, Corporation Sole - Types of C...

Corporation Sole - Types of Corporations However this is a legal office that is occupied through one human being only at any one time. Whether the person ceases to occupy

International competition law, International Competition Law -  Select...

International Competition Law -  Select a specific industry or corporation and analyse the factors that determine a competitive or anticompetitive outcome; - Factors such a

Advise sandy on the following issues, Problem I. Sandy has been worki...

Problem I. Sandy has been working for Bean Canning Ltd for 9 years. Last Monday Sandy was called to the Manager's Office and verbally informed that her employment was termi

Recognition of disputes, Recognition of disputes Recognition of dispute...

Recognition of disputes Recognition of disputes relates to a State not recognizing a certain dispute. However, if the whole world acknowledges a certain dispute then it is nece

Sources of us law of contract, Sources of US Law of Contract However t...

Sources of US Law of Contract However the Law of Contract Act 1961, S. 2(2) provides like, except as may be provided through any written law to the time being in force, hence

Market failures in the financial services industry, Question: State whe...

Question: State whether the following statements are TRUE, FALSE or UNCERTAIN. Briefly (two or three paragraphs) give reasons for your answer. (a) There are no market fail

Rights of guarantor against creditor, Rights of Guarantor Against Creditor ...

Rights of Guarantor Against Creditor Consequently the rights of the guarantor are: like (a) Further at any time after that the guaranteed debt such has become due and such prev

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd