case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'''' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'''' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'''' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'''' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Law of contract, Law of Contract: Mr.Sakr who owns a factory in Baabda...

Law of Contract: Mr.Sakr who owns a factory in Baabda for manufacturing furniture, signed a contract in his factory in 12-7-2009 with Mr.Abdo who used to import woods from Bra

Unity and continuity of domicile, Unity and continuity of domicile Co...

Unity and continuity of domicile Conversely S.10 of the Act provides such no person may have more than one domicile at any one time and no person shall be deemed for be witho

The policy process - advocacy coalitions and policy learning, The policy pr...

The policy process - Advocacy coalitions and Policy learning The mobilization of attention is what policy advocacy is primarily about. And the systematic mobilization of attent

Bulky and technical bills, Bulky and technical Bills: In fact some Bil...

Bulky and technical Bills: In fact some Bills are so bulky and technical hence they are passed without sufficient debate it means Parliament lacks the time and knowledge to th

TRANSFER OF TITLE, WHAT ARE THE EXCEPTINS TO THE ''NEMO DAT'' RULE?

WHAT ARE THE EXCEPTINS TO THE ''NEMO DAT'' RULE?

Collecting banker, Collecting Banker Furthermore a collecting banker i...

Collecting Banker Furthermore a collecting banker is protected through the following provisions: like; (i)Bills of Exchange or Swap Act.  with S.82 (1) provides such a ban

Hirer requires information from the owner, Hirer Requires Information from ...

Hirer Requires Information from the Owner Conversely the hirer requires some information from the owner whether he should send him a written request so and then like pay to hi

Statutory power - mergers and winding up, Statutory power - mergers and win...

Statutory power - mergers and winding up: It is usual to proceed under s.207 as there are technical difficulties over s.300 procedure.  The liquidator's powers to reach a comp

Contractual capacity of corporations, Contractual Capacity of Corporations ...

Contractual Capacity of Corporations However the courts have developed known as the doctrine to "ultra vires" in order for determines the contractual capacity for legal person

Definitions of phoenix activity, phoenix activity involves "the evasion of ...

phoenix activity involves "the evasion of tax and other liabilities, such as employee entitlements, through the deliberate, systematic and sometimes cyclic liquidation of related c

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd