User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'''' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'''' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'''' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'''' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Technique of reference to arbitration, Technique of Reference to Arbitratio...

Technique of Reference to Arbitration Whereas a dispute may be referred to arbitration through like as; The parties in accordance by the agreement and The court wh

Loans given for necessaries - void contracts, Loans Given for Necessaries -...

Loans Given for Necessaries - Void Contracts       It may happen that an infant asks someone to a loan for buy necessaries like school uniforms or textbooks.  Therefore the per

Describe remedies available for a case of judicial review, Question 1: ...

Question 1: (a) What is meant by: (i) Ratio Decidendi (ii) Obiter Dicta (iii) Legal Doctrine (b) Distinguish between Criminal Law and Civil Law.

Proxies - meetings and resolutions, PROXIES - meetings and resolutions: ...

PROXIES - meetings and resolutions: By S.136(1), any member of a company entitled to attend and vote at a meeting of the company shall be entitled to appoint one more person (

Give detail explanation of credibility problem, Give detail explanation of ...

Give detail explanation of Credibility problem There are indications that such credibility problem stems from a tension between the goal of encouraging innovation and investme

Explain the criminal jurisdiction, Explain The criminal jurisdiction Th...

Explain The criminal jurisdiction The criminal jurisdiction is exercised on the basis of the following: 1. Nationality 2. Territory 3. Universal jurisdiction and 4. Specifi

What are parliamentary procedures for passing legislation, What are parliam...

What are parliamentary procedures for passing legislation? Parliamentary procedure for passing legislation: A statute can simply be part of law while this has passed the

Good faith - meetings and resolutions, Good Faith - meetings and resolution...

Good Faith - meetings and resolutions: The directors must act in good faith when calling a meeting,.  Thus, in Cannon v Tasks, the directors called the annual general meeting

Law for Business organisation, The concept of separate legal personality is...

The concept of separate legal personality is fundamental to company law. With close reference to leading cases, explain this concept and its relationship to the doctrine of limit

Types of general meeting - meetings and resolutions, Types of General Meeti...

Types of General Meeting: The Statutory Meeting           By section 130 every public company limited by shares and every public company limited by guarantee and having a

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd