case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'''' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'''' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'''' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'''' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

What is the meaning of ethics in the corporate environment, QUESTION 1 ...

QUESTION 1 (a) Why is it that businesses are increasingly exposed to scrutiny and criticisms? (b) Discuss four strategies which can be adopted to respond to these criticisms

Period within which the dismissal itself must be effected, QUESTION 1 O...

QUESTION 1 One of the main ingredients of a system of collective bargaining is the right to join and participate in the activities of a trade union. What is the extent of this

Judicial limits and fact finding, American Courts, though vested with consi...

American Courts, though vested with considerable Constitutional authority, are limited in power by the other branches of the government, the States to some extent, and the people.

Contract condition, 1. What is the difference between modifying a contract ...

1. What is the difference between modifying a contract under common law and modifying a contract under the UCC? 2. What is a "waiver" and what are its implications? 3. What i

State differences between law and ethics, Question 1: (a) State five di...

Question 1: (a) State five differences between Law and Ethics. (b) Define what is meant by a ‘code of ethics' and state its importance for engineers. (c) Define the followin

Explain universal jurisdiction of criminal jurisdiction, Explain Universal ...

Explain Universal jurisdiction of criminal jurisdiction It is concerned with the application of a State's criminal jurisdiction in respect of offences committed against the int

Assets in the possession of creditors, ASSETS IN THE POSSESSION OF CREDITOR...

ASSETS IN THE POSSESSION OF CREDITORS:  If the creditor has seized assets in the course of executing a judgement for debt against the company and at the commencement of the wi

Exceptions - authority of partners, Exceptions - Authority of Partners ...

Exceptions - Authority of Partners The rule stated is a general rule, such there are a few exceptions for it.  Hence the chief of these exceptions are as follow: like; (a)

Law and morality, Law and Morality: Since morality contain of prescrip...

Law and Morality: Since morality contain of prescriptions of the society and is not enforceable, hence rules of law are enforceable.  However wrongs in society are contraventi

Removal - powers of managing director, Removal:             Article 10...

Removal:             Article 107 provides that the managing director's "appointment shall be automatically determined if he cease from any cause to be a director". However it

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd