Reference no: EM133437761
Question: Write a Development-MBTI self-reflection essay Based on the following result of the Jung types test.
Extroversion-Extroversion is your cognitive orientation. Introverts center themselves inside their bodies. Extroverts center their attention outside their bodies. Your score on I-E was 0.875 (scores range from -2 to 2) which indicates that you are extroverted (with medium confidence)
Intuition-Sensing-Intuition is the first pair of cognitive functions and the preference for how you prefer to be served information; through the five senses or from the subconscious. Your score on S-N was 0.5 (scores range from -2 to 2) which indicates that you are intuitive (with medium confidence
Feeling-Feeling-Thinking is the second pair of cognitive functions, the judging functions, which are used to evaluate goals; either through personal values or objective principles. Your score on F-T was -1 (scores range from -2 to 2) which indicates that you are a feeler (with high confidence)
Perceiving-Judging-Perceiving is what pair of cognitive functions you prefer to use; Judging is a preference for a structured lifestyle and the use of feeling and thinking while perceiving is the preference for a flexible lifestyle and the use of sensing and intuition. Your score on J-P was 1 (scores range from -2 to 2) which indicates that you are a perceiver (with high confidence)
Write down the following points.
Communication of preferences at work Please provide examples of concrete sentences you would prepare to let your team members or manager know about your working style based on your MBTI results - imagine you are writing them an email (8 points, 2 per dimension).
Adjusting to a manager's opposite MBTI type-Let's imagine that your manager (or leader) is the exact OPPOSITE of your MBTI type on all dimensions (which type would this be? 2 points): How would you concretely need to adjust your communication with her or him to match their own preferences and increase your chances of being understood - that is, what could you concretely do or say, for each of the 4 dimensions? (8 points, 2 per dimension).