payment is done. please try your best because I need at least 85% marks to pass this assignment. best of luck Experts Mind.com, I really appreciate for my assignment work. They have given me the assignent before a day to my deadline. It is cheaper than other sites. Thanks They have highly experienced staff and they did it in so professional manner that my professor appreciated me for my assignment. The rates are quite affordable

Excellent Cases selected relate to chosen topic and summaries are clear, precise, complete, and without error. HFS relates to the legal principles derived from all five of the selected cases in Part A. The facts presented in HFS are clearly defined and complete, and with out flaw.

• You do not need to provide a cover sheet. • Use a font no smaller than 11 point and line spacing of 1.5. • Use Calibrifont. • Use margin 2.54 cm on all sides. • You must provide a word count at the beginning of your assessment and for each part. All pages of the assessment must be numbered and your student ID number included in the header or footer.The word count includes in text referencing but NOT the reference list.

• Your assessment should be submitted in Microsoft Word (or rich text) format - .doc, .docx or .rtf. Please do not submit your assessment in PDF format, Apple Pages format, or in any other format. It is your responsibility to ensure that the file you submit is readable. Files that are not readable will be treated as non-submissions. Additionally, please take care to ensure that you have submitted the right version of the file (i.e., your final version, and not a draft version) and that you have submitted the assessment for this unit (and have not mistakenly submitted an assessment that was written for another unit). You are not able to ‘take back’ your submission and upload a fresh (correct) version of your assessment, however this should not be a concern, as only your most recent submission will be marked, provided it is submitted before the due date and time. Any further submissions beyond the due date and time will attract a late penalty. Please observe the following format:

Marking Criteria Assessment 3 is worth 50% of your final grade for this unit. The assessment will be marked in accordance with the following broad criteria: • Selection of relevant cases from chosen topic and quality of summaries. • HFS design – relevance of facts of the HFS to the selected cases. • Legal analysis – the application of legal reasoning skills to the HFS. • Critical reflection of the legal and ethical issues related to the HFS. • Organisation – communication and style. • Digital literacy – research and referencing. You will receive an individual mark for these criteria. These criteria will be defined by way of a rubric (attached to this document for your reference).

The objective of this task is for students to demonstratecritical legal reasoning skills (Part A, B, and C – ULO1&2) andgeneral critical academic skills (reading, thinking, and writing) to legal and ethical issues that arise in Sport and the Law (Part D –ULO1&3). In addition, this task requires students to demonstrate digital literacy skills (ULO4), by searching for, and identifying quality resources to support the research parts of the portfolio.It is important to recognise that the portfolio partscannot be done in isolation. Each part of the portfolio requires reflection on the other parts before and during the research and writing process. Marks will be awarded for your ability to identify the parts requirements, and execute each part with this reflective approach in mind.

Your task includes four parts. The first (Part A) is a case summary, which will requirestudents to research legal resources to select cases for the purpose of designing Part B. You will be required to provide case summaries of those cases, from one of the topics below. The second (Part B) is todesign a hypothetical fact situation, based on the selected cases in Part A. The third (Part C) is to apply critical legal reasoning skills to the HFS designed in Part B, and the final part (Part D) is to write a critical reflection on the area of law your HFS is based on. Each week during seminars for MLC710 we have tackled problem questions (HFS) in Sport and the Law. Your first assessment required you to advise parties of their legal positions in relation to two HFSs. Your second assessment required you to critically analyse and reflect/evaluate legal and ethical issues that arise in Sport and the Law (MMA). This assessment requires you to apply the combined skills developed from the first two assessments, with the addition of a case summary research component and a case design component.