Reference no: EM131393151
Neil deGrasse Tyson, the famous astrophysicist and science communicator (perhaps best known for the 2014 science documentary 'Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey' he presented), has recently suggested on Twitter that "Earth needs a virtual country: #Rationalia, with a one-line Constitution: All policy shall be based on the weight of evidences." The Tyson article is a further elaboration on the idea of Rationalia, and the Guhin piece is a sociologist's response.
This debate brings up some questions relevant to our course: What role should science play in our societies? How do we define science or religion? Does each have their own "legitimate magisterium" that does not (or should not) overlap? If we are worried about preventing religious ideas and beliefs from intervening in scientific activities and public policies, how should we draw boundaries between science and religion?
Imagine yourself writing a short opinion piece for a newspaper about Neil deGrasse Tyson's 'Rationalia' proposal. In your piece, please (1) begin by briefly summarizing what the 'Rationalia' proposal is about, (2) move to a discussion of 2-3 aspects of the 'Rationalia' proposal that you find valuable, interesting, unjustified, or problematic, and (3) end with a brief note on the public debate on science and religion (by using insights from Stephen Jay Gould's article on 'nonoverlapping magisteria').
1) Required readings
* Neil deGrasse Tyson (2016, August 7), "Reflections on Rationalia," Retrieved from
https://www.facebook.com/notes/neil-degrasse-tyson/reflections-on-rationalia/10154399608556613
* Jeffrey Guhin (2016, July 5), "A Nation Ruled by Science Is a Terrible Idea," Retrieved from:
https://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2016/07/neil_degrasse_tyson_wants_a_nation_ruled_by_evidence_but_evidence_explains.html
* Stephen Jay Gould (1997), "Nonoverlapping Magisteria," Natural History 106: 16-22 (reproduced here:
https://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_noma.html)
2) Reflection essay (minimum of 400 words)
Discuss which predictions you agree or disagree with
: Comment on which predictions were correct and which ones were inaccurate. Discuss which predictions you agree or disagree with.
|
Describe the components necessary to create identity
: describe the components necessary to create an effective professional identity and explain why professional networks are essential for professional development.
|
What are the legal and ethical implications of change
: What are the legal and ethical implications of change? How should current employees and leaders begin to prepare for this change? Prepare a change management plan that includes strategies to communicate relevant information to employees.
|
Describe levels of uncertainty and complexity for project
: Describe the levels of uncertainty and complexity for the project. Determine what the project manager should communicate to the customers about the project unknowns.
|
What role should science play in our societies
: Neil deGrasse Tyson, the famous astrophysicist and science communicator (perhaps best known for the 2014 science documentary 'Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey' he presented), has recently suggested on Twitter that "Earth needs a virtual country: #Rati..
|
Explain the elements of the project plan that depend on wbs
: Describe the elements of the project plan that depend on the WBS, and provide examples of any four. Explain why it is useful to have a complete WBS before engaging in formal uncertainty assessment.
|
Which characteristics are most important
: Which characteristics are most important? How are we doing? Can we attain this list?Answer this discussion question: Please make sure it is original with good grammar. Must be at least 200 words, NO cover sheet is needed also single space..
|
Calculate the current in the capacitor
: A coil of inductance 225mH and series resistance 25 Ω is connected in parallel with a 100uF capacitor. If the network is connected across a 250V 50Hz supply, calculate the following: The supply current (magnitude and phase angle) and The current in..
|
Which study design do you think is the most reliable
: Which study design do you think is the most reliable? Why?What about the most comprehensive? Why?Choosing a study design is based on evaluating strengths and weaknesses and comparing it against the type of information you are hoping to gain.Analyze..
|