Reference no: EM132463083

1. Be Attentive - Clarify the facts and issues involved

Question 1: What are the facts? Did you need more information?

Question 2: What assumptions were you making?

Question 3: What was the ethical conflict and how could you have defined your goal?

2. Be Intelligent - Identify the stakeholders

Question 1: Looking back, what were the goals of the key stakeholders? What sources of support might have existed?

3. Be Reasonable - Use the values of the ethical lenses

Question 1: How could you have used the 4 Lenses of the ELI to create a balanced response or made a more well-reasoned decision about what to do? Please apply the 3 questions from each of the lenses for this analysis. Note, they might not all arrive at the same answer, but you should try to integrate them into a final response as best you can.

4. Be Responsible - Communicate your final decision through an action plan

Question 1: What approach would have been effective? Dialogue? Adversarial? Questioning?

Question 2: What would be the most effective way for you to have spoken up in this situation or what would have made it more comfortable to communicate?

Question 3: What rationalizations did you need to be prepared for?

5. Be Reflective - Evaluate and reflect on the results

Question 1: What part of this decision-making model might have been most helpful for you to consider in this case? For example, did you rely too much on assumptions and keep quiet as a result? Was it difficult to consider others or see where they were coming from at the time? Was it difficult to make a decision or feel confident in your ethics? Or did you find it too difficult to act and not have an effective strategy for speaking up?