Reference no: EM133745403
Questions:
1. How did the false idea that "whites are more rational and less disposed to crime than other people" catch on among researchers?
2. There is evidence that white people's crimes are systematically ignored, excused and undercounted. What is this evidence, according to the authors?
3. In criminology today, what do studies of "race and crime" most often focus on, according to the authors?
4. How did racial scientists of the Enlightenment think about race?
5. What is scientific racism? What is the foundational assumption of scientific racism?
6. In a one or two paragraph summary of Brown & Barganier's historical research, describe the connection between the birth of white supremacy and the birth of criminology.
7. How did W.E.B. DuBois and Ida B. Wells-Barnett refute Hoffman's racist findings?
8. What's the problem with criminology as a field, according to Brown and Barganier?
9. What is Eugenics? How did the field of Eugenics influence the study of crime?
10. Brown & Barganier say, "What is remarkable about racial science is the way that all sorts of scientific investigations-carried out with rigor and genuine curiosity-were still tainted by the cultural, economic and political positioning of the scientists" (104). What do they mean by this?