The advertisement of prices for attorney services

Assignment Help Business Management
Reference no: EM131274564

Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
United States Supreme Court

Plaintiff-appellants Bates and O'Steen, licensed to practice law in the state of Arizona, opened a "legal clinic" in 1974. The clinic provided legal services to people with modest incomes for approximately two years, after which the clinic placed an advertisement in the Arizona Republic, a daily newspaper circulated in the Phoenix area, stating the prices it charged for legal services. The plaintiffs conceded that this advertisement was a violation of Disciplinary Rule 2-101(B) incorporated in Rule 29(a) of the Arizona Supreme Court rules, which stated in part:

A lawyer shall not publicize himself or his partner or associate, or any other lawyer affiliated with him or his firm, as a lawyer through newspapers, or magazine advertisements, radio, television announcements, display advertisements in the city telephone directories or other means of commercial publicity, nor shall he authorize others to do so in his behalf.

A complaint was initiated by the president of the State Bar of Arizona, and a hearing was held before a threemember special local administrative committee. The committee recommended to the Arizona Supreme Court that each of the plaintiffs be suspended from practice for not less than six months. The court agreed and ordered the plaintiffs suspended. The plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Justice Blackmun
The heart of the dispute before us today is whether lawyers may constitutionally advertise the prices at which certain routine services will be performed. Numerous justifications are proffered for the restriction of such price advertising. We consider each in turn:

1. The Adverse Effect on Professionalism. Appellee places particular emphasis on the adverse effects that it feels price advertising will have on the legal profession. The key to professionalism, it is argued, is the sense of pride that involvement in the discipline generates. It is claimed that price advertising will bring about commercialization, which will undermine the attorney's sense of dignity and self-worth. The hustle of the marketplace will adversely affect the profession's service orientation, and irreparably damage the delicate balance between the lawyer's need to earn and his obligation selflessly to serve. Advertising is also said to erode the client's trust in his attorney. Once the client perceives that the lawyer is motivated by profit, his confidence that the attorney is acting out of a commitment to the client's welfare is jeopardized. And advertising is said to tarnish the dignified public image of the profession.

We recognize, of course, and commend the spirit of public service with which the profession of law is practiced and to which it is dedicated. The present Members of this Court, licensed attorneys all, could not feel otherwise. And we would have reason to pause if we felt that our decision today would undercut that spirit. But we find the postulated connection between advertising and the erosion of true professionalism to be severely strained. At its core, the argument presumes that attorneys must conceal from themselves and from their clients the reallife fact that lawyers earn their livelihood at the bar. We suspect that few attorneys engage in such self-deception. And rare is the client, moreover, even one of modest means, who enlists the aid of an attorney with the expectation that his services will be rendered free of charge.

Moreover, the assertion that advertising will diminish the attorney's reputation in the community is open to question. Bankers and engineers advertise, and yet these professionals are not regarded as undignified. In fact, it has been suggested that the failure of lawyers to advertise creates public disillusionment with the profession. The absence of advertising may be seen to reflect the profession's failure to reach out and serve the community. Studies reveal that many persons do not obtain counsel even when they perceive a need because of the feared price of services or because of an inability to locate a competent attorney. Indeed, cynicism with regard to the profession may be created by the fact that it long has publicly eschewed advertising, while condoning the actions of the attorney who structures his social or civic associations so as to provide contacts with potential clients.

2. Inherently Misleading Nature of Attorney Advertising. It is argued that advertising of legal services inevitably will be misleading. The argument that legal services are so unique that fixed rates cannot meaningfully be established is refuted by the record in this case. The appellee State Bar itself sponsors a Legal Services Program in which the participating attorneys agree to perform services like those advertised by the appellants at standardized rates.

3. The Adverse Effect on the Administration of Justice. Advertising is said to have the undesirable effect of stirring up litigation. But advertising by attorneys is not an unmitigated source of harm to the administration of justice. It may offer great benefits. Although advertising might increase the use of the judicial machinery, we cannot accept the notion that it is always better for a person to suffer a wrong silently than to redress it by legal action.

4. The Undesirable Economic Effects of Advertising. It is claimed that advertising will increase the overhead costs of the profession, and that these costs then will be passed along to consumers in the form of increased fees. Moreover, it is claimed that the additional cost of practice will create a substantial entry barrier, deterring or preventing young attorneys from penetrating the market and entrenching the position of the bar's established members.

These two arguments seem dubious at best. Neither distinguishes lawyers from others and neither appears relevant to the First Amendment. The ban on advertising serves to increase the difficulty of discovering the lowest cost seller of acceptable ability. As a result, to this extent attorneys are isolated from competition, and the inventive to price competitively is reduced. Although it is true that the effect of advertising on the price of services has not been demonstrated, there is revealing evidence with regard to products: where consumers have the benefit of price advertising, retail prices often are dramatically lower than they would be without advertising. It is entirely possible that advertising will serve to reduce, not advance, the cost of legal services to the consumer.

The entry-barrier argument is equally unpersuasive. In the absence of advertising, an attorney must rely on his contacts with the community to generate a flow of business. In view of the time necessary to develop such contacts, the ban in fact serves to perpetuate the market position of established attorneys. Consideration of entry-barrier problems would urge that advertising be allowed so as to aid the new competitor in penetrating the market.

5. The Adverse Effect of Advertising on the Quality of Service. It is argued that the attorney may advertise a given "package"of service at a set price, and will be inclined to provide, by indiscriminate use, the standard package regardless of whether it fits the client's needs . . . . Even if advertising leads to the creation of "legal clinics" like that of appellants-clients that emphasize standardized procedures for routine problems-it is possible that such clinics will improve service by reducing the likelihood of error.

6. The Difficulties of Enforcement. Finally, it is argued that the wholesale restriction is justified by the problems of enforcement if any other course is taken. Because the public lacks sophistication in legal matters, it may be particularly susceptible to misleading or deceptive advertising by lawyers.

It is at least somewhat incongruous for the opponents of advertising to extol the virtues and altruism of the legal profession at one point, and, at another, to assert that its members will seize the opportunity to mislead and distort. We suspect that, with advertising, most lawyers will behave as they always have: They will abide by their solemn oaths to uphold the integrity and honor of their profession and of the legal system.

In sum, we are not persuaded that any of the proffered justifications rise to the level of an acceptable reason for the suppression of all advertising by attorneys. As with other varieties of speech, it follows as well that there may be reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner of advertising.

The constitutional issue in this case is only whether the State may prevent the publication in a newspaper of appellants' truthful advertisement concerning the availability and terms of routine legal services. We rule simply that the flow of such information may not be restrained, and we therefore hold the present application of the disciplinary rule against appellants to be violative of the First Amendment.

CRITICAL THINKING ABOUT THE LAW
As you know, a judge's reasoning is not always clear. In the course of writing an opinion, a judge may discuss an assortment of topics. Your task, as a reader, is to organize those topics into a meaningful pattern and then locate the reasoning in the decision. Only then are you ready to think critically about the case. The following questions should help you better understand the reasoning in Case 8-2.

1. The Court clearly listed the reasons the State Bar of Arizona offered for restricting price advertising. Justice Blackmun evaluated those reasons.As critical thinkers, you realize that identifying the link between the conclusion and reasons is imperative. What reasons did the Court offer for allowing attorneys to advertise their prices?

Clue: Remember that the Court concluded that, under the First Amendment, the state may not suppress advertising by attorneys. What reasons did Justice Blackmun use to reach this conclusion?

2. What primary ethical norm dominated the Court's consideration of the advertisement of prices for attorney services?

Clue: Go back to the Court's examination of the reasons offered by the State Bar of Arizona. Look closely at Justice Blackmun's response to reason 3. Furthermore, consider the last two paragraphs of the opinion

3. Suppose that the State Bar of Arizona had introduced evidence that advertising causes the price of attorney's services to increase. Do you think Justice Blackmun would have come to a different conclusion? Why or why not?

Clue: Look at the discussion of undesirable economic effects on advertising. Consider the primary ethical norm you identified in question 2. Do you think Justice Blackmun would consider this piece of evidence to be extremely persuasive?

Reference no: EM131274564

Questions Cloud

Concepts of marking and consumer segmentation : Analyze the advertisement using the concepts of marking and consumer segmentation, and discuss how it aligns to the organization's mission and find an international version of an advertisement for one of the products.
Will this material provide good glass-forming tendencies : How many grams of BaO can be added to 1 kg of SiO2 before the O:Si ratio exceeds 2.5 and glass-forming tendencies are poor? Compare this with the case when Li2O is added to SiO2.
Did the war change america role in the world : Analyze 1 major consequence the conflict had on United States' society. How did this war affect American sensibilities, including the way Americans viewed the war and themselves?
Hire the profit-maximizing amount of labor : A company sells pencils in a perfectly competitive product market and hires workers in a perfectly competitive labor market. Assume the market wage for workers is $ 150 per day. a) What rule should this company follow to hire the profit-maximizing ..
The advertisement of prices for attorney services : What primary ethical norm dominated the Court's consideration of the advertisement of prices for attorney services?
What are some of the important applications of glass-ceramic : What are the advantages of using glass-ceramics as compared to either glasses or ceramics?
Evaluate formation levels along a profile : Find the reduced levels of grid point showing calculation for each grid point and apply the arithmetic checks and draw the Grid on A-3 size graph paper. Plot Contours at 1m interval with a suitable scale showing the relevant data
What are linear and branched polymers : What electrical and optical applications are polymers used for? Explain using examples.
Whether a fine is constitutionally excessive calls : Whether a fine is constitutionally excessive calls for the application of a constitutional standard to the facts of a particular case, and in this context de novo review of that question is appropriate.

Reviews

Write a Review

 

Business Management Questions & Answers

  Comparing the deployment strategies utilized by the video

Comparing the deployment strategies utilized by the video gaming firms in each of the generations, identify any timing

  Unemployment benefits taxation and allocationplease explain

unemployment benefits taxation and allocationplease explain the following ideas1. when the government tries to cut the

  Training needs analysis

Training Needs Analysis - What is the difference between a Proactive Training Needs Analysis and a Reactive Training Needs Analysis?

  Show the steps in decision maing

Set managerial objectives and what do we want to achieve in the process? This activity may also be called recognizing the problem to solve.

  Drawing connections between each of the resources

This week, we will be expanding on the work we started in week two of this course. Rather than just analyzing resources, this week we will be blending our resources into a larger frame, drawing connections between each of the resources and to our ..

  Market niche strategies and focused strategies

Market niche strategies and focused strategies

  Good definitions of the cycles

Class, There is a lot to cover this week before the final so even though some students have not gotten involved yet, I want to keep going. You have provided some good definitions of the cycles

  Calculate the forward premium-discount on the dollar

Calculate the forward premium/discount on the dollar (which is your home currency) as well as the premium/discount on the euro if the spot rate is €0.73/$ and the three-month forward rate is €0.81/$. (Note: Label clearly which percent is for the doll..

  Benefits of various brands of lawn care products

Scott's lawn care has employed henry associates to find out whether home enhancement warehouse stores communicate the benefits of various brands of lawn care products otherwise than smaller stores

  Joe is going on a survival hike in the desert

The boots the salesman suggests are well made and are appropriate for normal hiking, but are not suitable for Joe's planned ordeal. Relying on the salesman's selection, Joe buys the boots.

  Show two standard organizational designs

Organizational Design in Business - Show two standard Organizational Designs.

  Prepare a personal and professional development plan

Prepare a Personal and Professional Development Plan (PPDP) for your continued leadership development, drawing on your reflections and insights.

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd