Reference no: EM132261566

Evans wanted money promised: so Noted again.

Amid all the want, from what we are given here, neither Evans nor Dyer followed-through with a said consent in the form of a contractual agreement? Thus no agreement existed, implied or otherwise as regards details either during construction or after completion. Nor was there any written contract to the affect if glitches present themselves after construction that Dyer would pay Evans.

All we have is that Evans built a house, which doing we can assume - herewith - he did so of his own volition, assuming that Dyer would pay him for having done so, whether or not the job was fulfilled. That it was safe or not to live in is inconsequential.

Therefore, Dyer is at once exculpated of any responsibility because Evans took building the house upon himself. Evans voided all possibility of receiving any compensation by reason of not securing an agreement; moreover, there indicates no naive deception.

One says A; the other, B. And neither conjugates the two such that a C is carried out in turn.

Here is what we have in conclusion: he built a house, broken or not. And what Dyer owes is nothing. And what Evans owes is affording Dyer the peace of mind that comes by Evans letting Dyer alone.

Neither one owes the other anything but putting between each other plenty of space. Therefore, Dyer does not get a house; Evans does not get a single red penny, the work completed notwithstanding.