Description Organization is the internal structure of a piece of writing, the thread of central meaning that ties the piece together from beginning to ending. The body of a piece of academic writing can be organized around a variety of structures. Solid academic writing uses transitional words and phrases to provide logical connections and sequencing.

5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

10.0 %Research No outside sources were used to support the assignment. Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

10.0 %Conclusion Summary of the major points of the paper is either not present or not evident to the reader. Summary of the major points of the paper is present, but it is vague and/or poorly developed. Summary of the major points of the paper is present, but it is cursory and lacks depth. Summary of the paper is evident to the reader. Makes recommendations to resolve the health issue within the target population. Arguments presented follow logical progression and support claims. Summary of paper is clearly evident to the reader. Makes recommendations to resolve the health issue within the target population based current literature. Arguments support all claims with clarity, order, and richness of detail.

Includes essential knowledge about the components with supporting details and examples. A few areas of the assignment criteria were not addressed. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate to the criteria. Justifies reasons and claims. Covers components in-depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is exceptional. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Fully justifies reasons and claims with supportive examples and details.

40.0 %Multiple component assignment (Criteria for Components: Target Population, Health Issue, Relationship Between Health Issue and Target Population, and Current Strategies/Interventions) Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident. Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or is outlined poorly. Includes little knowledge about the components with few supporting details and examples. A large portion of the assignment criteria was not addressed Little subject knowledge is evident. Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Includes knowledge about the components with supporting details and examples. A small portion of the assignment criteria were not addressed. Some subject knowledge is evident. Surface level of evaluation of the content is offered.

Research Paper 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% 3 Satisfactory 75.00% 4 Good 85.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 100.0 %Content 10.0 %Introduction Purpose of the paper is either not present or not evident. Purpose of the paper is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Briefly mentions the purpose of the paper, target population, and health issue. Purpose of the paper is present, but lacks depth and/or clarity. Outlines the purpose of the paper, target population, and health issue. Purpose of the paper is present and clearly evident. Introduces the purpose of the paper and general introduction to target population and health issue. Purpose of the paper is present and comprehensive, forecasting further development in paper. Introduces the purpose of the paper and general introduction to target population and health issue.

Refer to the "Academic Writing Guidelines Resource." Be prepared to present a rough draft of your Research Paper for peer review at the beginning of Topic 6. Use the completed "Peer Review Guide" from Topic 6 in making revisions and modifications to the final draft of your Research Paper. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. HLT515.v10R.Academic Writing Guidelines Resource