Reference no: EM133721983
Assignment:
I NEED HELP RESPONDING TO THESE TWO STATEMENTS
1) Why and how is conflict good for society? Coser's theory, when simplified, means that sociological conflicts can have positive results. Now, when you look up exactly how conflict can be positive, the results are, surprisingly, understandable. One result, for example, is that it can lead to having problems solved, and new, creative ideas being created. When you think about this logically, it is not wrong. Creativity, when given enough fuel, will be able to provide many solutions to existing and future problems. Where does this apply to the real world? I will use the workplace as an example. When conflict arrives at a workplace, things can either escalate or die down. It all depends on how the issue is approached, but conflict is not always going to end well. After all, conflict usually leads to more chaos and destruction than necessary.
I hate to say it, but I strongly believe that the chances of conflict having a negative outcome are a little bit higher in recent years, ever since the pandemic brought out the worst in quite a bit of people, as well as showing their hatred and anger towards the rules put in place to keep people save, and yes, this was a shot at the Karens and anti-mask people that you could see on the internet. Not everyone benefits from conflict, though. While some people can thrive with the positivity it can bring. people are different. Due to this, there is bound to be someone who does not like how a conflict ends and may try to restart it to make it end in their favor. In other words, conflict is an unwinnable battle, since one person's benefit is another's loss. Thank you for taking the time to read this. That is all from me for now, so goodbye.
2) Coser's theory has many underlying definitions, but the overarching theme can be looked at as, conflict is beneficial and essential for society if that conflict has relevant cause and concern. A real-life example that followed Coser's theory can be any of the riots from 2020, mainly the Black Lives Matter, or BLM movement. This conflict was the discrimination and prejudice against African Americans ever since the ages of slaves. In other words, it was more of a built up anger that eventually fizzled and exploded after George Floyd's untimely and unfair death. It fulfilled and was good for that degree of society because the extent of the protests allowed more freedom and decreased racism towards African Americans. It also highlighted freedoms for other minorities like those of the LGBTQ+ and smaller racial groups. L
ike stated in the article, this "cleared the air" essentially with how that specific group felt they were being treated. It was also a "realistic" conflict, and a long time coming. There have been many instances growing up where I have viewed and observed not only racism from others around me, but also older and more "old-fashioned" family members that were conditioned to think and behave that way growing up. In my opinion, while there was some disruption in this movement, the idea of it all needed to happen so that people understand and realize that racism in any sense is not okay. It causes way more damage than good, even if one believes they are making a simple joke.
This conflict was pent up inside, and as someone who does not receive racial injustice, I could not understand or imagine what it would be like to live in a world where my worth and my achievements are in jeopardy because of unjust racial ideals. Overall, Coser's theory is a great way to explain this specific movement and it's motives.