Has p complied fully with relevant procedural rule

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM133369297

Assignment:

P Served a set of interrogatories on D. After 60 days, P finally hears from D in a short email that said, "See attached." The attachment contained all twenty of P's interrogatories with answers that to all twenty merely saying, "objection: improper interrogatory." Another 30 days went by, P was very upset with D, but P never bothered to reach out to D to resolve the issue. With the discovery deadline quickly approaching, P thought to motion to extend discovery, but instead he decided to "go for the throat." At the 11th hour before the deadline, P files a motion to compel discovery and requesting sanctions. "This will show that him once and for all," P quietly grumbled to himself. Neither P nor D had filed any previous motions with the Court.

1 What relevant Federal Rule(s) of Civil Procedure applies to this fact pattern?

2. May D refuse to answer interrogatories by simply writing, "Objection: improper interrogatory."?

3. Has P complied fully with relevant procedural rule? Why or why not?

Reference no: EM133369297

Questions Cloud

Why is it relevant that mr shea was separated from his wife : Why is it relevant that Mr. Shea was separated from his wife and lived alone? Why did the doctor offer the old man a Cadillac as part of the deal?

What are the two sides called in a civil trial : What are the two sides called in a civil trial? What are the two sides called in an intermediate case? What are the two sides called in a supreme court case?

Define driving forces of corporate social responsibility : Define in detail each of the five driving forces of corporate social responsibility and make an argument regarding which of the forces is most important.

Which theory is oceanwave least likely to recover : Ocean wants to sue for either slander or wrongful interference. Under which theory is OceanWave least likely to recover?

Has p complied fully with relevant procedural rule : May D refuse to answer interrogatories by simply writing, "Objection: improper interrogatory."? Has P complied fully with relevant procedural rule? Why?

Is paul obligated honor this kind of employees request : Is Paul obligated honor this kind of employees request? Explain. What should Paul done differently?

Would it require irb or privacy board review under hipaa : Would such a study be subject to IRB review under the Common Rule? Would it require IRB or Privacy Board review under HIPAA?

How can researchers obtain certificates of confidentiality : Under what circumstances will Certificates of Confidentiality be provided automatically? How can researchers obtain Certificates of Confidentiality.

Should a company be allowed to patent a life form : Should a company be allowed to patent a life form? Does it matter if the life form is a non-sentient organism like a plant?

User Account

All Pages