I got professor level work and receibe=ve the solution much before the deadline. The writer is excellent and received work is also of high quality.

Follow the attached file and check the required details and I am expecting that the writer needs to be fully explained the terms to be written in the work.

Fail 0-39.9% Relevance to the title and learning outcomes is intermittent or missing. The topic is reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms. Relevance to practice is barely considered or not at all. Lack of the basic knowledge in either theory or practice necessary for an understanding of the topic. Inadequate and often inaccurate description and paraphrase. Evidence of analysis, critical consideration and independent thinking is lacking. Little evidence of coherent argument. There is a lack of development and the work may be repetitive and/or thin. Bibliographical apparatus is unacceptable. Poorly written with numerous deficiencies in syntax, spelling, expression and presentation. The writer may achieve clarity (if at all) only by using simplistic or repetitious style.

Pass 40-49.9% Some degree of irrelevance to the title and learning outcomes. Superficial consideration of the issues. Relevance to practice tends towards superficiality and is largely implicit. Basic understanding of a limited range of theoretical and practice related material. Little appreciation of its significance. Largely descriptive or narrative in style with limited evidence of analytical ability and/or independent thinking. Conclusions are not always clear or logical. Wholly uncritical and conforming to standard views. Conclusions are not always clear or logical. Some attempt to construct an argument is evident but it lacks sufficient clarity and coherence. Issues at stake are only vaguely stated. Significant errors in referencing and bibliography. Barely acceptable. Style of presentation, syntax, spelling and format all pose obstacles for the reader. Nevertheless, meaning is clear.

Average 50-59.9% Generally addresses the title and learning outcomes, sometimes addresses irrelevant issues. Demonstrates the ability to consider issues effectively, although does not always do so. Relevance to practice is addressed, but may be implicit in places. Adequate knowledge of a limited range of relevant theoretical and practice related material with intermittent evidence of an appreciation of its significance. Some evidence of analytical ability. Independent thinking, often in broad terms and tends to be uncritical. Intermittent passages of descriptive or narrative material, which lacks clear analytical purpose. Conclusions are not always clear or logical. Material conforms to standard views. Reasonable attempt to construct an argument is evident. Occasionally lacks clarity and coherence. Some inconsistencies in referencing and bibliography but generally acceptable. Generally competent writing although intermittent lapses from standard syntax and spelling pose occasional obstacles for the reader. Format is acceptable.

Merit 60-69.9% Generally addresses the title and learning outcomes, sometimes addresses irrelevant issues. Relevance to practice is effectively addressed but may be implicit in places. Ample knowledge of a fair range of relevant theoretical and practice related material with. Intermittent evidence of an appreciation of its significance. Adequate analytical treatment, with evidence of some independent thinking. Occasional descriptive or narrative passages with lack of analytical purpose. Conclusions are clear and demonstrate attempts to engage with alternative views. Adequate attempt to construct a coherent argument, but may suffer loss of focus and consistency. Issues at stake may lack clarity or theoretical modes couched in simplistic terms. Consistent use of referencing and bibliographical apparatus, which may contain minor inaccuracies. Generally competent writing. Intermittent lapses from standard syntax and spelling. Presentation is generally acceptable as is the format. Work is word-processed.

Classifi-cation Grade Relevance Knowledge Analysis and Independent Thinking Structured Argument Referencing & Bibliography Presentation Distinction 70-100% Directly relevant to the title and learning outcomes. Able to address the implications, assumptions and nuances of the title. Relevance to practice is thoroughly and explicitly addressed. Makes effective use of a comprehensive range of theory and practice knowledge. Is able to manipulate and transfer some material to demonstrate a grasp of some of the themes, questions and issues in both theory and practice. Adequate analysis of the material resulting in clear and logical conclusions. Contains some distinctive or independent thinking. Beginning to formulate an independent position. Coherent and logically structured, making use of an appropriate mode or argument and/or theoretical model. Consistent accurate use of referencing and bibliographical apparatus. Well written with standard spelling and syntax. Style is lucid utilising an appropriate and error free format. Work is word-processed.

Learning, teaching AND ASSESSMENT Strategy A series of lectures and seminars will provide essential module information. This will be supported by practical exercises, group learning activities and individual project work. Core academic skills will be developed through the use of subject specific literature, student led presentations and guided tasks. These will enable students to understand key concepts and theories, evaluate the appropriateness of different approaches to solving problems and communicate the outcomes clearly using structured arguments. A virtual learning environment will also provide a range of additional lecture notes, relevant literature, self assessment activities, and links to online resources. The diversity of teaching approaches combined with individual study will ensure all module aims are achieved and a rigorous approach to the acquisition of a range of subject specific, cognitive and transferable skills.

INDICATIVE ASSESSMENT Number of Assessments Form of Assessment % weighting Size of Assessment/Duration/ Wordcount (indicative only) Category of assessment Learning Outcomes being assessed 1 Written Assignment 50 2000 words Coursework 1 & 2 1 Written Assignment 50 2000 words Coursework 3 & 4

Contents Page Module Aims 1 Module Content 1 Learning Outcomes 1 Indicative Assessment 2 Module Pass Requirements 2 Module Learning Plan 2 Bibliography and Learning Support Material 3 Support for Students with Disabilities 3 Student Feedback 3 Outline Teaching and Assessment Plan 4 Assignment Briefs 5 Assessment Guidance 10