Reference no: EM131927313

Case Study: Locate a recent court case, lawsuit, or an article addressing a court case or lawsuit involving discrimination in the selection criteria and methods used for hiring or a promotion. Write a paper of at least 500 words in length about the selected manuscript. You are required to use at least your textbook and a court case as source material for your paper.

Be sure to include the following information in your paper:

• Provide a brief description of the selected manuscript.

• Identify the selection criteria and methods, and discuss how they relate to the needs of the organization in the case.

• Include an analysis of the criteria and methods used for selecting the employee in the manuscript.

• Include a discussion of the legal and ethical issues related to equal employment opportunity as they pertain to the employment selection process in this manuscript.

• What impact will this court case, lawsuit, or article have on HR management?

• All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations in APA format.

Question 1: If you could add another amendment to the Bill of Rights, what would it be? Provide an example of why your amendment is necessary and discuss its potential impact.

Question 2: Differentiate between the Federalists and federalism.

Question 3: Explain the concept of checks and balances as it relates to the sharing of power.

Question 4: Discuss the reasons why ratification of the Constitution was problematic.

Question 5: What are the three sections of the Constitution? Describe the contents of each section.

Question 6: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's stated mission is to stop and remedy unlawful employment discrimination. With a 2015 federal budget of over $365 million dollars, they will process over 88,000 cases against private and public sector firms. Since 2008, they have asked to significantly increase their budget to pursue more cases. If you were the U.S. President, would you agree with them? Why, or why not?