Reference no: EM134038253

Questions:

1. Whom has the field of public administration been developed? Has Philippine public administration been simply reacting and following the lead of the international public administration community? Or do we need to develop and design local and Philippine- based fields, or could these be incorporated into existing fields? A good example would be another emerging field, perhaps, an indigenous form of governance?

2. How have public administration structures, systems and institutions in the Philippines responded to the broader questions of promoting accountability, transparency and participation?

3. What has been the role of information, communication and technology in making public administration more responsive to the stakeholders who really matter?

4. How have public administrative structures, processes and institutions responded to the ever pressing problem of poverty?

5. What has been the impact of globalization and the response of PA structures, institutions and processes in the development and evolution of Philippine public administration?

6. How can we address the problem of maldistribution where those who have less in life should have more in governance and public administration?

7. How can we develop indigenous Public Administration practices - like Gawad Kalinga? How can we replicate and further mainstream good practices of governance and development in a venue of cooperation, trust, and partnership with various stakeholders?

8. How can the government offer better services with spending less money?

9. How can the government offer better services with available sources?

10. In introducing the principles of New Public Administration, does the serves enhance social equity and how?