51-59 The explanation of VSM is clear but needs some interpretation and simplification. Some elements of ‘cut and paste’ evident in the explanation. The model is referenced from sources, some of which are considered of good quality. Weighting to total 100 30 40-50 The explanation of VSM is provided but needs some interpretation. Strong elements of ‘cut and paste’ evident in the explanation. The VSM is referenced from limited sources, some of which are considered of reasonable quality. 31-39 The explanation of VSM is poorly provided. Significant elements of ‘cut and paste’ evident in the explanation. The model is referenced from extremely limited and/or unknown sources, blogs articles, Wikipedia, etc. 0-30 The explanation of VSM is unclear with no evidence of research and explanation. Significant evidence of ‘cut and paste’ in the explanation. A significant lack of references of quality or relevance.

Weighting to total 100 30 80-100 Great clarity in the explanation of the proposed value stream. The VSM is well constructed and described in a language that is understood. The VSM has excellent detail in terms of it components – customer, product/service, process steps, measurements and symbols. Extensive evidence of reading of top quality sources. 70-79 Very good clarity in the explanation of the proposed value stream. The VSM is well constructed and described in a language that is understood. The VSM has very good detail in terms of it components – customer, product/service, process steps, measurements and symbols. Very good evidence of reading of top- quality sources. 60-69 Good clarity in the explanation of the proposed value stream. The VSM is well constructed and described in a language that is understood. The VSM has very good detail in terms of it components – customer, product/service, process steps, measurements and symbols. Very good evidence of reading of top- quality sources.

? Redraw the overall Value Stream Map with the improvements implemented and indicate the potential benefits that these changes could make to the overall Value Stream. 10% Word/Page count: Overall Assignment is 5- 10 pages Total %: 100% of marks for the module

? Identify some potential improvements in the Value Stream based on your observations. These improvements can relate to the lean wastes or process instabilities or errors. Provide some evidence that supports your reason for improvement. This evidence can be estimated data, observations, blockages, delays, excess inventory, customer comments, etc. 20% ? Pick two areas you identified for improvement. In each case, use the DMAIC cycle to Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve and Control the improvement. ? Present your answer using the PowerPoint template provided. ? For the purposes of the academic exercise, you can assume a Root Cause and you do not need to provide evidence. ? Develop suggestions on how to improve the processes using lean tools of 5S, SMED, Kanban, error proofing or solutions derived from TRIZ or other means. ? The use of Process mapping, layout diagrams, visual aids will be required to outline the problems and potential solutions. 2 X 20%

Assignment Details Percentage In Excel, construct a Value Stream Map of a business process. This process can be of your own choosing but must outline the following items, ? Details of the Customers ? Details of the Customer Requirements – Quantities, Frequencies, Deliveries ? Demands defined of the Suppliers ? An outline of the internal process flow ? For each process step outline some critical parameters, examples could include duration, inventory, yield, wastage, resources, etc. ? An identification of Value-Add Activities and Non-Value Add Activities ? Details of Customer deliveries 30%

Lean assignment using a value stream map (VSM) I have attached all the files for this assignment. 1000 words no references times new roman, 12, font (I HAVE PROVIDED A TEMPLATE VSM TO MAKE THIS EASIER)