Reference no: EM134007434
Question
Julia is a 40-year-old female patient who experienced a stroke one month ago. For the last 10 years she had been living independently, in her own home. Since the stroke Julia needs help with all of her daily activities, and a recent assessment by a speech pathologist concludes that Julia cannot swallow safely,
suggesting that she now requires an aphasic (soft food) diet. When the meal arrives and the nurse bringsthe food to Julia's mouth, she purses her lips and tells her to stop-she is angry and states she will noteat the soft foods. Julia tells the healthcare team that food, coffee, and the occasional glass of wine areamong the few pleasures she has left in life and that to her taste, the soft diet and thickened fluids areunpalatable. Furthermore, she feels that the soft diet reduces her to feeling like a baby. Julia makes itclear that she wants the team to reorder a "normal" diet.Some of the nurses on the unit do not feel comfortable feeding Julia something that she couldpotentially choke on. They fear that if Julia aspirates when they are helping her with a regular diet, theywill be held responsible for her death; however, they know that if they only offer to feed her soft foodsJulia will go on a hunger strike. Julia's partner Mark is very concerned about her safety and insists that the risk for choking is too high, and the healthcare team needs to take steps to maintain her nutritional status by inserting a feeding tube.
Outlines how bioethics or virtue ethical theories were used to support understanding of the ethical issue in the case scenario.
Describes the key considerations and application of these theories to the ethical issue and how the ethical theory(s) helped to clarify the issue.
Provides an overview of how the ethics scholarly literature (minimum of 3 articles) has viewed and resolved similar ethical challenges. Links these views back to the theoretical lenses that were used to understand the ethical issue
Identification of ONE (1) ethical action that would support resolution of the ethical issue, using an ethical decision-making framework.
Ensures the ethical action is supported by the nursing ethics literature.
Explores how the chosen action addresses the impact of biases, stereotypes, and systems of oppression that perpetuate inequities in care/practice.
|
Discuss the pros and cons of adopting this technology
: One of the areas of concern to Mr. Magone and the senior leadership. Discuss the pros and cons of adopting this technology.
|
|
Mission of academic medical center-acute community hospital
: Explain the similarities and differences between the mission of an academic medical center versus the mission of an acute community hospital.
|
|
Directly impacts quality improvements and patient care
: Evidence-based practice, influenced through research, directly impacts quality improvements and patient care outcomes by explaining the "WHY".
|
|
Define the role of institutional review board
: Define the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) when conducting research.
|
|
Describes key considerations and application
: Describes the key considerations and application of these theories to the ethical issue and how the ethical theory(s) helped to clarify the issue.
|
|
Define health literacy
: Define health literacy. Why do you feel health communication is included as a goal in Health People 2030?
|
|
Swallow large bite of food without properly
: If you swallow a large bite of food without properly chewing it first, you will feel discomfort during ventilation.
|
|
Patient has medical history of dementia
: Patient has a medical History of dementia, tissue loss to right ear cancer, pulmonary hypertension, CAD, BPH, Diabetes 2, Heart Failure, multiple pressure ulcer
|
|
Ethical mandates in achieving the mission of midwifery
: Three ethical mandates in achieving the mission of midwifery to promote health and well-being toward women and newborns within their families and communities
|