Reference no: EM134004706
Question: Working in groups of 2, critically analyse the human resource management practices of two global companies in an industry of your choice. Based on your critical analysis, provide managerial implications/recommendations for the HRM of firms in that industry.
This assessment is designed to evaluate your ability to:
Apply IHRM theories and frameworks to real organizations
Demonstrate critical analytical thinking
Compare HR practices across multinational firms
Develop evidence-based managerial recommendations
Engage with academic literature appropriately
Core Requirements
A. Choice of Industry and Companies
You may select:
Any industry (e.g., technology, oil & gas, retail, hospitality, finance, manufacturing, consulting)
Two global companies operating in the same industry
Recommended criteria for selecting firms:
Multinational operations
Availability of HR information
Clear global HR challenges
Comparable organizational scale
Required Analytical Focus
Your analysis must focus specifically on HRM practices in an international context. No AI shortcuts — Get authentic assignment help from qualified, real tutors.
Critical Requirement
You must apply theories from at least TWO lectures covered in the course.
You must:
Explain the theory
Apply it analytically
Evaluate its relevance
Compare findings across firms
You must:
Evaluate HR practices using theory
Identify contradictions and tensions
Compare firms systematically
Use scholarly evidence
Structure of the Report
1. Introduction
Industry overview
Rationale for company selection
Key research questions
Structure of the paper
2. Theoretical Framework
Explanation of key IHRM theories used
Justification of their relevance
3. Company Analysis
Company 1
HR practices
International HR challenges
Theoretical interpretation
Company 2
Same structure for comparability
4. Comparative Analysis
Similarities and differences
Explanation using theory
Contextual factors
5. Managerial Implications & Recommendations
You must:
Translate analysis into actionable insights
Provide industry-level recommendations
Justify recommendations theoretically
6. Conclusion
Key insights
Theoretical contributions
Practical significance
Referencing Requirements:
APA Referencing Style is Mandatory
You must use:
Academic journal articles
Scholarly books
Credible reports
Avoid over-reliance on:
Company websites
Blogs
Non-academic sources
Minimum Recommended Sources
12-20 academic references
Word Limit
2000 words ± 10%
Excludes references
Group Presentation
Each group must present:
Key theoretical insights
Major findings
Comparative analysis
Recommendations
All group members are expected to actively participate.
General Instructions to Candidates:
Every group of you should sign the declaration form uploaded with this assignment, assign it and put it after the cover page of this assignment (all group members must sign).
You should download a copy of the assessment, so you do not need to access the internet continuously.
Please check VLE Moodle and email announcements regularly during the assessment period for any additional information that may be sent out.
The assignment must be your original piece of work.
Ensure clarity, coherence, and proper referencing of sources in your submission.
The report should be structured logically with clear headings and subheadings.
Each student is responsible for the authorship of specific sections of the report. A Contribution Matrix must be included immediately after the cover page, clearly indicating which student was responsible for drafting each section. While each student is assigned primary responsibility for specific sections, all group members are expected to review, discuss, and contribute to the overall coherence and quality of the report.
Contribution Matrix:
Student / Sections Written / Additional Contributions
Referencing Style: APA 7th Referencing.
Plagiarism will be detected, and the use of AI tools is prohibited.
Best Practices for Group Projects
Use a Shared Document:
Write the entire project on a collaborative platform (e.g., Google Docs) so all group members can access, edit, and comment in real time.
Final Review Session:
Organize a group meeting to review the full document, check consistency, and ensure smooth flow across sections.
Presentation Preparation:
Do not let a single member prepare the slides alone.
All members should contribute to slide design, content, and speaking order.
Continuous Feedback:
Each member should review sections written by others, provide constructive feedback, and ensure the writing style and terminology are consistent.
Collaborative Decision-Making:
Major decisions about analysis approach, recommendations, and conclusions should be agreed upon collectively, not individually.
Accountability & Documentation:
Keep track of who is responsible for each section.
Document progress and revisions to avoid last-minute conflicts or gaps.
Style requirements
Your assignment should be double-spaced, in a 12-point size throughout, using Times New Roman or Arial font. The pages should be numbered, and the margins should not be less than 1 inch on all sides, marks will be deducted for citation, spelling, or grammatical errors.