Thank you for the solution to the essay question, it was properly done. However, the references are over 5 years old and we are only allowed to use references that are only 5years old those over 5 years are unacceptable. Therefore, could you give me some references that are only 5 years or less in the assignment. Thank you very much.

10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.

5.0 %Two additional scholarly research sources with in-text citations. None of the required elements (two topic-related scholarly research sources and two in-text citations) are present. Not all required elements are present. One or more element is missing and/or an included source(s) is not scholarly research or topic-related. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one reference is questionable. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from reputable professional sources. All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.

20.0 %Discuss An Ethical Issue An ethical issue is not present. An ethical issue is present. Argument, and/or discussion is absent or inadequate. An ethical issue is present, but done at a cursory level. An ethical issue is clearly presented. Argument supports claims and is convincing. Discussion is convincing. An ethical issue is clearly presented. Argument supports claims and is insightful and convincing. Discussion is thorough and insightful. 15.0 %Identify the Guidelines Addressed by the APA or ACA and Discuss How the Issue Is Addressed by the Organization Identification of the guidelines addressed by the APA or ACA is not presented. Identification of the guidelines addressed by the APA or ACA is present. Discussion is absent or inadequate. Identification of the guidelines addressed by the APA or ACA is present, but done at a cursory level. Identification of the guidelines addressed by the APA or ACA is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Identification of the guidelines addressed by the APA or ACA is clearly presented. Discussion is thorough and insightful.

Rubic 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 76.00% 3 Satisfactory 81.00% 4 Good 89.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 30.0 %Compare the Philosophies of the Two Organizations and Briefly Discuss the History of the Organization's Development of These Guidelines A comparison of the philosophies of the two organizations is not present. A comparison of the philosophies of the two organizations is present. Discussion is absent or inadequate. A comparison of the philosophies of the two organizations is present, but done at a superficial level. A comparison of the philosophies of the two organizations is clearly presented. Discussion of the history of each organization's development of these guidelines is thorough. A comparison of the philosophies of the two organizations is clearly presented. Discussion of the history of each organization's development of these guidelines is detailed and insightful.