Login

Create Account
+14156709189
info@expertsmind.com
Submit Homework/Assignment
Get quote & make Payment
Get Solution
beard strategy, Game Theory, Game Theory
#questi1 A, Explain how a person can be free to choose but his or her choices are casually determined by past event
2 B , Draw the casual tree for newcomb''s problem when Eve can''t perfectly detect Adam''s casual history. The probabilities of Eve rightly or wrongly detecting whether adam will later open only the black box instead of opening both boxes are respectively denoted r and w. recal that L denotes the smaller amount of money always in the clear box and M denotes the larger amount of money that eve might might put in side the opaque box E A
C, Derive the two expected payoffs formulas E A (1B / r, w) and E A ( (2B /r,w) and use them to solve for another formula that equals the smallest value of M (denoted M*) required in order for Adam''s expected payoff from opening only the opaque box to exceed that from opening both boxes by a multiple of as least ( a sign that looks like derivative) L what is the resulting formula for M*. finally suppose (L, sign that looks like derivative I don''t know ) = (300, 95), (r,w)=(.58, .43) and use the formula for M* to calculate the numerical value of M* for this case
2. A, Suppose a CD player player tries to detect whether its partner is C player instead of a DD player by looking for external signals that are at least as typical for DD players than DD players than for cd players draw a diagram tp explain how two boundariesb.L and bu are optimally determined by the minimum likehood ration Lmin. Show on the diagram where it is optimal to respond C versus D. Also explain what happens to the boundries when detection becomes more cautious by raising the minimum likehood ration
b. What is meaning of the LDD detection strategy
c. What is the main problem with the green beard strategy? Explain how the LDD strategy overcomes this problem
3. A. If CD players are able to use the LDD strategy better than pure chance then explain what happens to the signal reliability ration as a CD player detects more cautiously
b. Assume a population contains either CD ot DD players where each player is randomly matched with partner taken from the whole population. Also assume the fear and greed payoff differences are equal. What are the expected payoff formulas for CD players [ denoted E(DD/x CD ) ] depending on the fraction of CD players in the population, denoted x CD \
c. Use expected payoff formulas of part C to algebraically derive an inequality for the signal reliability ration r/w that determines when the CD players will outperform the DD players. Thenuse this inequality with Part A, to explain how CD players can always outperform DD players starting from any positive initial fraction of CD players x CD > 0.
4, A. Use the inequality derived for part C question 3; to obtain an inequality required x *CD = 1 to remain stable against DD invaders. Also draw the ROC diagram discussed in class for visually representing this stability inequality
B. Explain how a diagram similar to that shown in part A can be used to derive a prediction of what will happen to the CD players equilibrium probability of cooperating if the fear and greed pay off difference decrease relative to the cooperation payoff difference
C. Again explain how a diagram similar to that shown in Part A can be used to derive a prediction of what will happen to the CD player equilibrium probability of cooperating if they exchange email messages instead of talking talk face to faceon..
Posted Date: 5/2/2013 2:21:47 PM  Location : United States
Ask an Expert
Related Discussions:
beard strategy, Game Theory, Assignment Help, Ask Question on beard strategy, Game Theory, Get Answer, Expert's Help, beard strategy, Game Theory Discussions
Write discussion on beard strategy, Game Theory
Your posts are moderated
Write your message here..
Related Questions
Games with strategic moves, Games with Strat e gic M ov es ...
Games with Strat e gic M ov es The ideas in this chapters can be brought to life and the students can better appreciate the subtleties of various strategic moves an
Subgame , A subset or piece of a sequential game starting at some node such...
A subset or piece of a sequential game starting at some node such {that each that each} player is aware of each action of the players that moved before him at every purpose. Sub ga
Ordinal payoffs, Ordinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of a...
Ordinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of a game where the worth of the numbers isn't vital, however solely the ordering of numbers. for instance, when solving for a
Draw a table representing the prisoner.s dilemma game, 1. (a) True or False...
1. (a) True or False: If a 2x2 game has a unique pure strategy Nash Equilibrium, then both players always have dominant strategies. (b) Draw a table representing the Prisoner.s Dil
Bidder, An auction associates who submits offers (or bids) to sale or buy ...
An auction associates who submits offers (or bids) to sale or buy the goods being auctioned.
Weakly dominant strategy , A strategy is weakly dominant if, no matter what...
A strategy is weakly dominant if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a payoff a minimum of as high as the other strategy, and, the strategy earns a st
Determine the perfect sub game nash equilibrium, Consider the situation in ...
Consider the situation in which Player M is an INCUMBENT monopolist in an industry, which makes a profit of $10m if left to enjoy its privileged position undisturbed. Player P is a
Extensive kind, The in depth kind (also referred to as a game tree) may be ...
The in depth kind (also referred to as a game tree) may be a graphical illustration of a sequential game. It provides data concerning the players, payoffs, strategies, and also the
Finding Equilibrium in Game Theory, This is Case of Competitive Games. ...
This is Case of Competitive Games. Player 2 L R Player 1 L (60,40) (70,30) R (65,35) (60,40) Are either have dominant st
Nash Equilibria, Two people are engaged in a joint project. If each person ...
Two people are engaged in a joint project. If each person i puts in the effort xi, the outcome of the project is worth f(x1, x2). Each person’s effort level xi is a number between
Assignment Help
Accounting Assignment Help
Economics Assignment Help
Finance Assignment Help
Statistics Assignment Help
Physics Assignment Help
Chemistry Assignment Help
Math Assignment Help
Biology Assignment Help
English Assignment Help
Management Assignment Help
Engineering Assignment Help
Programming Assignment Help
Computer Science Assignment Help
IT Courses and Help
ExpertsMind Services
Online Tutoring
Projects Assistance
Exam Preparation
Coursework Help
Programming Courses
Engineering Courses
Why Us ?
~Experienced Tutors
~24x7 hrs Support
~Plagiarism Free
~Quality of Work
~Time on Delivery
~Privacy of Work