Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
1. Consider a two-player game where player A chooses "Up," or "Down" and player B chooses "Left," "Center," or "Right". Their payoffs are as follows: When player A chooses "Up" and player B chooses "Left" player A gets $5 while player B gets $2. When player A chooses "Up" and player B chooses "Center" they get $6 and $1 correspondingly, while when player A chooses "Up" and player B chooses "Right" player A gets $7 while player B gets $3. Moreover, when player A chooses "Down" and player B chooses "Left" they get $6 and $2, while when player A chooses "Down" and player B chooses "Center" they both get $1. Finally, when player A chooses "Down" and player B chooses "Right" player A loses $1 and player B gets $1. Assume that the players decide simultaneously (or, in general, when one makes his decision doesn't know what the other player has chosen).
(a) Draw the strategic form game.
(b) Is there any dominant strategy for any of the players? Justify your answer.
(c) Is there any Nash equilibrium in pure strategies? Justify your answer fully and discuss your result. When an action is never chosen by a player it is because this action is DOMINATED by another action (or by a combination of other actions). Dominated strategies are assigned a probability of 0 in any Nash Equilibrium in mixed strategies. Given this observation answer the following parts of this problem:
(d) Find the best response functions and the mixed strategies Nash Equilibrium if each player randomizes over his actions.
(e) Show graphically the best responses and the Nash Equilibria (in pure and in mixed strategies).
Equilibrium payoffs a) The reward system changes payoffs for Player A, but does not change the equilibrium strategies in the game. Player A still takes the money at the fir
Limitations of game theory in finance
Assuming that there are only 2 airline companies in the world, Delta and US Airways, what is the ((Nash) Equilibrium) or price that each company in the following matrix will charge
Computer Game Zenda This game was invented by James Andreoni and Hal Varian; see their article, "Pre-Play Contracting in the Prisoners 'Dilemma".The paper also contains some co
A non-credible threat may be a threat created by a player in a very Sequential Game which might not be within the best interest for the player to hold out. The hope is that the thr
Paired Prisoners' Dilemma Students can be paired off and instructed to play several ver-sions of a particular game with a prisoners' dilemma structure.Provide each pair with a
One charm of evolutionary game theory is that it permits for relaxation of the normal fully-informed rational actor assumption. People, or agents, are assumed to be myopic, within
James and Dean are playing the Chicken game. They have noticed that their payout for being perceived as "tough" depends on the size of the crowd. The larger the crowd, the "cooler"
A priori knowledge usually enables us to decide that some coefficients must be zero in the particular equation, while they assume non-zero values in other equations of the system.
Explain the financial system terms definitions. The Financial System Definitions: Wealth It is sum of Current Savings and Accumulated Savings Financial asset P
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd