Programming languages, Theory of Computation

Different types of applications and numerous programming languages have been developed to make easy the task of writing programs. The assortment of programming languages shows, different interpretations that can be given to information. However, from the perspective of their power to express computations, there is very minute difference among them. Accordingly different programming languages can be used in the study of programs. The study of programs can benefit, however, from fixing the programming language in use. This enables a unified discussion about programs. So the program can be defined as a finite sequence of instructions over some domain D. The domain D, called the domain of the variables, is assumed to be a set of elements with a distinguished element, called the initial value of the variables. Each of the elements in D is assumed to be a possible assignment of a value to the variables of the program. The sequence of instructions is assumed to consist of instructions of the following form.

Posted Date: 3/18/2013 1:09:43 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Programming languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Programming languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Programming languages Discussions

Write discussion on Programming languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Another way of representing a strictly 2-local automaton is with a Myhill graph. These are directed graphs in which the vertices are labeled with symbols from the input alphabet of

matlab v matlab

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations


Lemma 1 A string w ∈ Σ* is accepted by an LTk automaton iff w is the concatenation of the symbols labeling the edges of a path through the LTk transition graph of A from h?, ∅i to

To see this, note that if there are any cycles in the Myhill graph of A then L(A) will be infinite, since any such cycle can be repeated arbitrarily many times. Conversely, if the

This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But

1. Simulate a TM with infinite tape on both ends using a two-track TM with finite storage 2. Prove the following language is non-Turing recognizable using the diagnolization

draw pda for l={an,bm,an/m,n>=0} n is in superscript