Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Automata and Compiler
(1) [25 marks] Let N be the last two digits of your student number. Design a finite automaton that accepts the language of strings that end with the last four bits of the binary expansion of N. (1.1) Make a regular expression ? of this language. For example the set of strings that end with 101 is expressed by a regular expression (0+1)*101. (1.2) Make an NFA that accepts this expression ?. You should remove any ?-moves that can be done trivially by inspection. (1.3) Make a subset automaton that accepts the language. (1.4) Perform state minimization on the above automaton.
(2) [25 marks] A CFG is given by S ? aSbS, S ? bSaS, S ? c
(2.1) Draw a syntax chart for this grammar. [5]
(2.2) Write a Python program for the recursive descent parser Trace the parser using two strings of at least 10 symbols, one for an accepted case and one for an unaccepted case. Do the trace using the style in the notes. [20]
(3) [25 marks] A sample program for computing the greatest common divisor by recursive call and its object program are given below. Some sample comments are given.
const a=75, b=55;
var x, y;
procedure gcd;
var w;
begin
if y>0 then begin
w:=y;
y:=x ? (x/y)*y;
x:=w;
call gcd;
end;
x:=a; y:=b;
write(x);
end.
0 jmp 0 21 Jump to 21, start of main
1 jmp 0 2
2 inc 0 4
3 lod 1 4
4 lit 0 0 Load literal 0
5 opr 0 12 Test if y>0
6 jpc 0 20 Jump to 20 if false
7 lod 1 4 Load y
8 sto 0 3 Store in w
9 lod 1 3
10 lod 1 3
11 lod 1 4
12 opr 0 5
13 lod 1 4
14 opr 0 4
15 opr 0 3
16 sto 1 4
17 lod 0 3
18 sto 1 3
19 cal 1 2
20 opr 0 0
21 inc 0 5
22 lit 0 75
23 sto 0 3
24 lit 0 55
25 sto 0 4
26 cal 0 2
27 lod 0 3
28 wrt 0 0 Write stack top
29 opr 0 0
Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations. The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a give
This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But
what exactly is this and how is it implemented and how to prove its correctness, completeness...
The generalization of the interpretation of strictly local automata as generators is similar, in some respects, to the generalization of Myhill graphs. Again, the set of possible s
advantaeges of single factor trade
Intuitively, closure of SL 2 under intersection is reasonably easy to see, particularly if one considers the Myhill graphs of the automata. Any path through both graphs will be a
Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give a strictly 2-local automaton that recognizes L 3 . Use the construction of the proof to extend the automaton to one that recognizes L 3 . Gi
It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to the accepting power of the model. The underlying idea is that whenever an ID (q, σ v) directly computes another (p, v) via
The Universality Problem is the dual of the emptiness problem: is L(A) = Σ∗? It can be solved by minor variations of any one of the algorithms for Emptiness or (with a little le
distinguish between histogram and historigram
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd