Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Automata and Compiler
(1) [25 marks] Let N be the last two digits of your student number. Design a finite automaton that accepts the language of strings that end with the last four bits of the binary expansion of N. (1.1) Make a regular expression ? of this language. For example the set of strings that end with 101 is expressed by a regular expression (0+1)*101. (1.2) Make an NFA that accepts this expression ?. You should remove any ?-moves that can be done trivially by inspection. (1.3) Make a subset automaton that accepts the language. (1.4) Perform state minimization on the above automaton.
(2) [25 marks] A CFG is given by S ? aSbS, S ? bSaS, S ? c
(2.1) Draw a syntax chart for this grammar. [5]
(2.2) Write a Python program for the recursive descent parser Trace the parser using two strings of at least 10 symbols, one for an accepted case and one for an unaccepted case. Do the trace using the style in the notes. [20]
(3) [25 marks] A sample program for computing the greatest common divisor by recursive call and its object program are given below. Some sample comments are given.
const a=75, b=55;
var x, y;
procedure gcd;
var w;
begin
if y>0 then begin
w:=y;
y:=x ? (x/y)*y;
x:=w;
call gcd;
end;
x:=a; y:=b;
write(x);
end.
0 jmp 0 21 Jump to 21, start of main
1 jmp 0 2
2 inc 0 4
3 lod 1 4
4 lit 0 0 Load literal 0
5 opr 0 12 Test if y>0
6 jpc 0 20 Jump to 20 if false
7 lod 1 4 Load y
8 sto 0 3 Store in w
9 lod 1 3
10 lod 1 3
11 lod 1 4
12 opr 0 5
13 lod 1 4
14 opr 0 4
15 opr 0 3
16 sto 1 4
17 lod 0 3
18 sto 1 3
19 cal 1 2
20 opr 0 0
21 inc 0 5
22 lit 0 75
23 sto 0 3
24 lit 0 55
25 sto 0 4
26 cal 0 2
27 lod 0 3
28 wrt 0 0 Write stack top
29 opr 0 0
Exercise Show, using Suffix Substitution Closure, that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 . Explain how it can be the case that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 , while L 3 . L 3 ⊆ L + 3 and L + 3 ∈ SL
Kleene called this the Synthesis theorem because his (and your) proof gives an effective procedure for synthesizing an automaton that recognizes the language denoted by any given r
Sketch an algorithm for the universal recognition problem for SL 2 . This takes an automaton and a string and returns TRUE if the string is accepted by the automaton, FALSE otherwi
For example, the question of whether a given regular language is positive (does not include the empty string) is algorithmically decidable. "Positiveness Problem". Note that
Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con
As de?ned the powerset construction builds a DFA with many states that can never be reached from Q′ 0 . Since they cannot be reached from Q′ 0 there is no path from Q′ 0 to a sta
Can you say that B is decidable? If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?
The language accepted by a NFA A = (Q,Σ, δ, q 0 , F) is NFAs correspond to a kind of parallelism in the automata. We can think of the same basic model of automaton: an inpu
To see this, note that if there are any cycles in the Myhill graph of A then L(A) will be infinite, since any such cycle can be repeated arbitrarily many times. Conversely, if the
De?nition Instantaneous Description of an FSA: An instantaneous description (ID) of a FSA A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) is a pair (q,w) ∈ Q×Σ* , where q the current state and w is the p
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd